Mad_Dog_Dante

They still are in the game as far as I know because rentals are still a thing. Also, they are already ninja released in the game, all that is missing is tech trees. So reinstalling is at your own discretion ^^

Feigning an internet gangsta persona still I see ^^ Sadism against bots is good gamedesign, it is what all singleplayer and coop design is about: mass murder onto hordes of cartoony characters. Designing sadism against human players in pvp is a sign of poor taste. @BLUB_BLUB, if Gasha_nai can't pull it off, you certainly cant ^^

What is funny is that the elephant in the room has been sitting in the porcelain cabinet for years now, and a giraffe just entered the room to see if we can fit it inthere too ^^ What's funny is when comparing the pinned 1000+ pages carrier complaints pages and the pinned DD complaint thread, o wait. There isn't one. Yes we are at 1000 pages long already when combined with the previous 2. What is funny is only starting to doubt the development team after the countless necessary nerfs to carriers which made them even more boring to play, and not seriously doubting their sanity releasing that crap intop the game 3 years ago in the first place ^^ Actually no. I'm saying carriers are not fun to play as well. I'm decent in them, I find playing them repetetive, shallow and spammy. Because their gameplay is repetetive, shallow and spammy by design.

Except sadism is usually applied in singleplayer or coop games against bots that have no soul, not in wonkey trash pvp design. Becasue when you do the pvp becomes wonkey and trash. ^^

Hayate becous paper admirals hate it

Ofc it is subjective, but that does not nullify the argument. It is a perfectly fine argument made by a consumer on a end user forum of an entertainment product. Carriers can be fun in very specific ways: being able to grief for the full length of a match, being able to attack without being in danger of being sent to port, beating defenseless targets senseless very slowly (sadism can be fun to people, even the righteous ones every now and then), getting easy kills shooting low HP targets with the rockets point blank etc. There are lots of traits to like about carriers for certain types of players and playstyles. But in general, carriers are unfun to play and play against. The low 4% popularity rate and the 1000's of pages full of complaints on this forum are a testament to that ^^

Very much this. It's even worse with the Russian carriers, because as soon as you pressed the fire button you press F and immediately are back at the ship hull view and can launch the next squadron even before the automated attack hits the target. These carriers usually don't even see their ordinance hit, it's bizarre how disconnected these ships are from pvp. The worst pvp class I have ever seen released in any game.

Curving torpedoes bug, 3 years of carrier beta testing and the current sub testing kinda shows both servers are considered test servers these days ^^ Even fitting the rental test subs cost actual in-game resources, like wut?

RN DD CL +1

Every game gets the players it deserves. Grief class griefs. Nothing to see here ^^

Seriously bob, stop hugging that 0.32%, leave some for the other players

It is interesting you keep making that claim. We suggest it is because you did not enter it's air detection range of about 2,5 km, which by the way is really absurdly short for a 100 m long ship on open sea, but there you have it: Lesta gamedesign at it's finest. Since everyone here except you understands there is nothing more to the overall mechanics of spotting and concealment when dealing with CV planes then air detection ranges and visual cover like smoke or islands, and you seem 100% entrenched in not making a miscalculation, we might want to assume your claim is the result of a bug. So, ask tech support. In that case, if you are looking to file a bug report, you will be asked to accompany your report with reproducable content. If not, it will be dismissed as per your own rebut: failed to produce 'evidence'. Your report won't even be considered for escalation if you can't support your claim. So, when you do this, produce that evidence to support your claim that you can fly your carrier planes directly over a visually unblocked DD and not spot it, come back here and show us as well will you? What I'm interested in is: How do you determine the exact location of a DD that you are not spotting to confirm you are flying right on top of them? Anyway, good luck producing that evidence for support. As I already suggested, setting up a training room and flying over inert bots should reproduce what you claim is happening. Or get someone to join you and sit in a DD for you to spot. That way the person will be able to confirm if you are flying in its air detection range, or not. Should be easy. Just keep trying until you can reproduce. ^^

Indication of an abnormally good player

When stupid becomes a religion applicable to all traits of life. ^^

Personally i only consider solo wr and avg. ships killed to be a usefull metric to see how I am doing lately. Partially also survival rate since I play the lower damage utility classes mostly (dd and ca/cl), which can be cruicial late game. Im a true 58 percenter. This includes learning the game, playing carelessly for long periods of time, grinding everything including the shitty stock versions without premium for ages and getting better at tactics the last 2-3 years. When looking at recent stats for individual ships i only consider 60-100 matches per ship to be somewhat representative to my understanding of it.

Wut? :o Didn't you see my little heart? It's actually cringy stuff like this that connects in a good way :D Also: I like carriers in general, just not poorly designed ones in this game. Just to be clear on things. ^^ And if you tilt your head sideways and squint your eyes a little bit You'll notice I made you a little Xmas tree.

Cringeworthy attempt at cheeky humor omg lol. <3

I read up a little on the NA forums and then realized I saw his vids about the CC exodus. I remember watching it and thinking I was looking at someone desperately trying to stay relevant to the hand that just recently started to feed him. A corporate yes man posing as a critical thinker and when confronted with actual insider information by the people he was talking about, playing an Asperger card. Mind bending acrobatics jumpstarting a career in the industry. Cringe.

Baited.

Top performing ITA ship in my line up ^^ For someone who owns the boards with the Venezia as my worst performing ITA ship I'd say the Genova plays like a non typical ITA cruiser probably. ^^

Yes we can.

Just saw this clip on his own Twitch channel where he can't gymnastcially bend his brain around the fact that he can be playing a broken class, but at the same time can be in situations where he is unable to carry 11 complete tomatoes to victory on his own accord. 'It just doesn't track'. Sounds like a perfect mindset, much like how Lesta has been tone deaf for the better part of 3 years now. A perfect marriage ^^ https://www.twitch.tv/ahskance/clip/AssiduousRealCarabeefChefFrank-yKa4aftTOs1SD-9T

My favorite cruiser line is the UK light cruisers. When it came out I'd never think AP only would be this much fun ^^

Have fun in that training room ^^

By the sounds of this, it's perfectly clear why he got the position at NA ^^