Mad_Dog_Dante
Players-
Content Сount
6,636 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Mad_Dog_Dante
-
Laughing so much I nearly soiled myself - iEarlGrey 'Honest Update'
Mad_Dog_Dante replied to Yaffle1234's topic in General Discussion
The jokes are juvenile and cringeworthy. Also no shadenfreude for me: Seeing this game ruined by it's own developer is actually pretty sad to witness.- 37 replies
-
- 13
-
-
General Submarines related discussions
Mad_Dog_Dante replied to YabbaCoe's topic in General Discussion
What did double ping on their latest guided torps do? Track more agressively? -
LMFAO. That is why this game models carrier gameplay true to it's real life character right? That is why carriers in game are found mostly alone by itself without a battle group around it, humping some obligatory island or corner of the map. Because that is what was happening IRL no? Their inertia to explosions, fires, flooding and recently even submarine attacks are modeled great as well, because that never happened right, carriers being sunk by subs or ordonance exploding. How about planes being invulnourable to any damage in their attack run and AA crews shooting at planes that werent directly attacking them and voided shooting at planes in attack runs, because that was doctrine, right? And lets not forget pilots being unable to spot a 100m long ship form 2,6 km range lol. What you are talking about is fine for a coop or SP game enviroment, but for class based PVP that kind of argumentation is nonsense, much like the rework has been surrealistic work of absurdity.
-
What words are covered by censorship?
Mad_Dog_Dante replied to callumwaw's topic in General Discussion
I don't think that the topic discussion frequency might be causing the nausia to be honest. OnTop: there is no WG curated list. -
Fun tidbit: WG are rebalancing carrier XP earnings in favor of kills over damage in the near future. Because it isn't enough carriers are already the perfect low HP target leeches, enhanced by adding 450 knt supercarrier special strikes, we actually need more carrier players focusing on killstealing :D Griefing the enemy team only is so 2018-2021 when we can have friendly team griefing added sprinkles on top ^^
-
General Submarines related discussions
Mad_Dog_Dante replied to YabbaCoe's topic in General Discussion
Take a guess based on the state of AA for 3 years lol. ^^ -
As far as i can tell superships will not become techtree ships, so no permanent ownership. Im guessing the random bundles will be replaced by a temp. rental of choice, but im just speculating here. Certainly not for clanwars, that would be bizarre. These are designed to be credit sinks mainly. Random is probably where they will live.
-
Earn another one of the convoluted tokens system in this game with which you can purchase random bundles which might earn you one random Supership rental ships for a limited time. Builds and all other costs for these temp ships cost the same as your perma ships. Basically credit sinks.
-
Have been 'looking at it' for the better part of 3 years lol. If I'm not mistaken there was a devblog about 4 additional carriers to be added of which 2 super carriers with special 450 knts single attack jet planes or something? Becasue if one thing the russian carrier showed us is that AA is still overrated. ^^
-
Or an auction item :P
-
Yeah, lootcrates gambling isn't making them enough as it is, they need more from us somehow. I agree: more mobile games inspired FOMO!
-
We are well over 1000 pages of biatching about the reworked carriers including the old 500+ pages carrier topic, the other 48+ something pages topic that got closed and the spare change of numerous closed single topic complaints. Over 3 years of suggestions, ideas, discussions, moaning, crying, trolling and what not. Consider me impressed. Hats off to you Lesta, and forumites. GG ^^
-
WOWP flopped massively because it's a pile of dung, just like how planes in WOWS are completely non immersive, weird and robot. There is simply no life or love to be found in either.
-
Rofl Direct clicks: https://eu.wargaming.net/shop/redeem/?bonus_mode=SAVEFUSOFOREVER https://eu.wargaming.net/shop/redeem/?bonus_mode=555M1KA333A https://eu.wargaming.net/shop/redeem/?bonus_mode=TORPEDORELOADBOOSTER https://eu.wargaming.net/shop/redeem/?bonus_mode=FASTANDFURIOUS
-
Yup that is what a manly pie charts looks like. Destroyers, cruisers and a slice of battleships on the side.
-
He graciously presented a profile that has equal cruiser and dd games played, and number carrier games played as a very close second, and BB games not even that much far behind. He plays everything, which is great. Claiming he is a DD main based on that profile is This is me. I do not consider myself to be a DD main. I am a light armored vessel player, because most of the cruiser matches are light cruisers. ^^
-
You have the tools to stay conceiled most of the time. The occasional detection fluke by planes is the same as running into another dd, except you can see the planes coming which makes it possible to adjust your plans accordingly most of the time. I see no need for further DD specific nerfs other then global spotting changes for carriers in general that they seem to be testing, and perhaps the direct hits with skip bombs in general, which is unnecessary. They could have programmed it so the first bounce doesnt detonate on impact to make skip bombers actually skip before they can hit.
-
General Submarines related discussions
Mad_Dog_Dante replied to YabbaCoe's topic in General Discussion
Dismissing complaints about poor gameplay implementation is weird. Even your own post already point to how detached and uncharacteristic this class is currently behaving in the gameplay arena. Much like carriers which used to be a tactical focused class that was mischaracterised into a dumb spam oriented class to appeal to masses, the subs are also being misrepresented to appeal the 'silent majority'. A simple case of dysfunctional producers working with bad gameplay designers leading to a massive waste of resources and a degrading quality of their product as a whole. -
Teenage Wanker 3: Wazzup Homies I'm playing the cool 3. WL3 ^^
-
It's not a bug and carriers. not fun.
-
According to @Seraphice this is extraordinary rare. Except it isn't? Or is it? No?
-
[Poll] Did you use the "Single-Use Coupons" = 25% OFF that lasted just for the holidays?
Mad_Dog_Dante replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Are the other coupons multi-use? -
Wut is NSFW?
-
The main reason why I've been lurking around this long is to bear witness to these perfect storms. Submarines being the latest glorious addition by the producers and gameplay designteam. Three (!) years of, most likely very costly, development, 2 (!) years complete level design department lockup, so no scenarios development, and then ending up with nothing to show for it in submarine gameplay except a completely disconnected and uncharacteristic gameplay model of submarine warfare. Not even featured in a new gamemode they named 'Convoy' lol. It's bizarre.
- 305 replies
-
- 10
-
-
-
If coop wasn't so inherently boring due to poor AI and an even worse mob of farmer Joe's that should be playing Farming Simulator 22, and wasn't hopeless in grinding silver lines, I'd probably still be playing this game.
