Mad_Dog_Dante

Didn't try, because I play 2 3 matches per day max, sometimes none like on weekends and can't be arsed to grind anything much anymore. Despite having great clanmates, I can't stand the absolute bottom end low entertainment quality of the majority of matches.

Becous 2 mm

When nonsense is a narrative. Easy to learn, hard to master <- gap

I sailed the TII Umikaze in mid and higher tiers and actually doing quite well because of it's low detection range and 8 km torps

The issue is the nature of the battleship class we have in WOWS and the way systems are designed that makes BB's take their current role. Players react to what WG designed, good and bad players alike. Every game gets the gameplay and playerbase it 'deserves'.

Yep contibute by adding the word 'properly' and melt the discussion magically with your CC laser eyes. +1 Ah, and why is that? Because I agree, but you seem to really want to disagree with me even if going dark on your own terms is essential. Because if you can't go dark, you will be farmed. So tell us why without using your magic word. Sure, you can take your BB there, but you will get stuck if your team doesnt follow up or even starts to kite away and leaves your right flank open to enemy DD's or BB's or both, while you are still fighting BB's up north. We are not discussing if i's possible to push up, but why many BB players choose not to, and the argument that is hip currently is HE spam. I'm arguing that it's not the HE spam itself, but the risk of overcommitting in a game with random teammates that often only 'support' your push by hiding behind the islands closest to it's spawn. You will still be committed if the push turns sour and your teammates retreit.

In coop, where games can be over in 3-5 minutes, BB's are as much 'fun' as carriers are. The games are over before you can actually start to have fun in those 2 classes. If you play scenarios, in that case I'd go for the carrier. If you play coop alot I'd go for a cruiser instead.

HE isnt 'too strong', wtf. Granted it's a ridiculous phenomena that fire damage is more prominent to this naval battle game compared to floodings currently, but that is how backward WG's designers nerf the game, constantly. They simply have no clue how to model naval battles. How did we end up with this new forum hype that HE is 'too strong'? Will making BB's more fireproof encourage BB's to actually push in? Ofcoarse not, get real. They will simply survive longer at their current ranges. Because the real reason BB's do not push in, unlike DD's and to a lesser extend cruisers, is that BB's will be fully commited once they make their move to push into a defending enemy. The real reason BB's won't push is that they can't go dark and turn back if things go bad when their team won't help or even starts running away, which often happens. TL;DR BB's won't push because they often have to fully commit themselves and are then stuck with their decision. Removing dead-eye won't help the stale gameplay WG developed much either.

Counterplay hahaha. You joker. I did 100k+ damage to an FDR last week and killed a whopping 15 bomber planes and 7 spotter/returdfighters. He hardly damaged me but his teammates had a blast hitting me constantly because of his spotting. So even when we 'counterplay' properly its pretty pointless in cases like these. O what was it you said last? What does damage even mean when its done by passive systems? What counterplay are you referring to this time? Hm? O wait, is it steering our BB into an FDR's torpedo attack planes? Or did you forget how WG made the FDR even more insane where it can turn it's planes 90 degrees on a dime? Yeah, that must be it.

No shizzles given, no grind nizzles.

A line only needs to be fully researched to be able to reset as far as I know.

By making it really bad?

You slotted rpf on your battleships before? Did you quit wot coming to wows?

No other class of ships needs to be limited to 1 per side because of its influence except carriers.

What a very black and white thing to say

I do to. I have sub zero faith in WG releasing something that will make the game better and more interesting without throwing a giant wrench in everything else, based on how poorly they performed the last 2 years. Except for their fom techniques and gambling ofc. Those will be on par.

This is the geste of it. Ot is not the total amount of damage generated, it is about how that damage is applied that has lost tactical depth, everything these spreadsheet mongrols touch lose character and depth.

Not even that well disguised personal brag threat.

WG's notion of fun is opening lootboxes. Their balancing revolves around making things average so the spreadsheet doesn't complain. When carriers are involved in my ship sinking, it's usually because of carriers spotting and not by carriers.

This. Ive been a solo player for years. If I hadn't joined an active clan, I would have stopped playing long ago.

So I was checking out my stats in her, to see if i could remember her. Noticed there is an old and a new Kirov? What happened after 10.6.2019? Was she changed?

I actually hate that you put the 7 prov behind the FOM dockyard mechanic. Just more reason to dislike the gambling and manipulation crap your company has been pushing onto everyones babies and mothers. Sell it in the premium shop.

Ranked match start. Fantastique, already pink, reverses immeditately. Sails along south coast at 1/4 speed until the match is won for him. I don't understand why these arses can't be publicly shamed.

Substances were involved. I am pleasanrly surprised by the outcome.