Mad_Dog_Dante

I am going to restrain myself and not state the obvious.

Yeah yeah we know, you mean this not that and when push comes to shove you're not saying anything at all. Since we are talking about a live test enviroment here and not about a proof of concept, numbers matter. Except to you ofc. Didnt you block me?

1.2 mil potential damage in one strike is a bad execution even if the concept was good, and since you are really poor at conceptualizing gameplay and game design, I can see why you are here saying silly things ^^

HE bombs.

As its fairly easy to avoid torps and citadels in a BB while keeping the enemy team at range, dot fire damage is just a small contributor to battleships not pushing. Especially since BBs get set on fire far away all the time. BBs dont push because they have range. Period. They dont need to push to perform adequately on a personal level. There are way more incentives to not push then there are reasons to do so. WG designed it like this and after trying a couple of things they just gave up and inserted deadeye. Lol.

Understood, thanks. At WG it is about what's easier. Explains a lot actually.

They need more points allocated to the skill 'choosing life partners'

You've just uncovered the reason why this type of rewards are not 'free'. You pay in dopamine.

Gambling is the essence of life, the fabric of the universe

Dont give them to the people that already have them in the first place? If port includes string grozovoi then not rental grozovoi

The reasoning and solid argumentation is strong in this one ^^

I actually hate being in a leisure time activity enviroment that relentlessly advertises gambling every time I'm in port. This bombarment of high grade manipulation tactics every chance they get, in all their events, the way they handle the UI (port is producing an absurd level of CPU and GPU heat compared to the game itself), the way they offer ships, the pure scumbaggery of promoting gambling in a 7+ rated game, it all annoys and irritates the f out of me frankly.

Radar isnt a big issue for DDs, they actually make dd life interesting, except for the bs stealth radar, but hey, WG is going to WG

'Jezus', ofcoarse they are stupidly broken when they can remove 4/5th of a BB's health in 1 drop if that ship made the 'mistake' to decide to tank an enemy push using an island to shield one of it's two broadsides. How is it even possible to do that in a live testing enviroment. Any halfwit designer should have looked at it in closed testing and think, hm, maybe this shouldnt be possible to begin with.

My funniest record is 2 ships sunk by ramming XD

What a glorious way to miss a point. Well done sir.

We already had 2 other main pinned topics before about curry of which one was in the 500 numbers if I recall correctly, good chance we are on 1000 pages of curry discission already mate.

The idea is FOM

As a Blyskawica, Atlanta and Flint owner I'd say don't buy anything if you don't want it tampered with. I'm still in tears and up in arms about the Atlanta losing it's role as a fleet AA cruiser.

If this stacking wasn't working as intended clearly alpha testing failed.

I didn't see the Iowa one before, just had a look thanks to @xxNihilanxx. That Iowa wasn't even shot at by other ships, so the damage was all HE bombing rofl. How can you test this offline when programming, show it to the designers and they decide: perfect, lets play test this to collect data. Wut?

Oh it wasnt the alaska? Vids get blocked in my browser. There is a iowa being pummeled? Good grief (pun intended)

It's good. The developer is not.

What really irks me, and what really stands out as scumward, is how the amount of effort put into predicting human behavior in their marketing manipulation efforts is contrasted by how little effort they put in predicting human behavior in gameplay by tunnelvisioning on their spreadsheet. The gameplay gets worse with every effort as their leeching efforts intesifies.