Mad_Dog_Dante

GG trying to look all sciency there bud. ^^ Good luck 'explaining' your stuff endlessly while assuming that everyone telling you it's baloney didn't read it properly.

Dayum! Working as intended!

Right. Well, let me agree with your that overall in every class we have a pretty low number of capable players running BB's CA's DD's and CV's anyway. So water under the bridge. But as for carriers? Nobody misses carriers in matches without them. You're pushing an urban myth about carriers being important to gameplay. They aren't. Matches without carriers are absolutely fine.

ROFL. Carriers are needed to provide spotting in this game? ^^ Seriously, games without carriers are perfectly fine.

Dude. I'm a fan. I read everything.

Yeah. It's funny in a way though.

CV's make that phenomena worse. The camping BB's are increasingly dangerous to supporting and advancing cruisers near the front line because of the inadverted spotting carriers bring. So now cruisers camp more too when carriers are in the match. And then DD's won't go for caps becasue of carrier spotting and will stay near their camping BB's and cruisers because they need AA support in case a carrier decides to focus them. So DD's now camp too. And then everybody camps. Well done WG, great succes.

He got that new 'narrative' from me i think. I slapped him around 'explaining' that plane damage done by AA is meaningless unless it leads to actual planes being killed, because plane damage is 100% repaired instantly without using up any resource when planes land on the carrier deck. Sorry. My fault.

That isn't a potato lol. It's the earth wearing a tinfoil hat.

Hahaha. and that 'careful balancing' takes them over the 2 year mark, is still ongoing while throwing in new wrenches like the absurd and completely different working FDR and now the unpredictable different working russian carriers everyone was asking for.

Except the earth isn't a potato. Nice to see you found a new euphemism for your relentless efforts : 'explaining'. I think most of us here understand the mechancis behind the Rewreck perfectly fine, and don't need you 'explain' things, because what you fail to acknowlegde is that is it not about individual ships being broken, but the design of the carrier class itself being decremental to the gameplay and funfactor of everything else in the game without giving something of that back to the other classes in return. That is what is broken.

Because of this?

I actually report bad playing carriers on either team for bad play, which does nothing. If it even discourages 1 player from aspiring a career as a carrier main its already working as intended. I think its funny. I find it even more hilarious when cv players come to the forums and shed salty tears over something that has barely any consequences other then their butthurt sense of selfworth. EDIT: I actually compliment good CV players as well by the way.

As in game being reported has little to no consequences, the risk involved is like playing carriers themselves: no risk involved. And as for never touched by another non-cv player, it's even worse: even CV players won't touch other CV players.

I played the Satsuthing today. Absurd grouping wtf. Fun for the Satsu unfun for everyone else.

Hey, it's a free country. Well here it is at least :P

I got me 2M fxp where's my Smaland WG

WG told us we'd have enough time to gather the 2M FXP. So, just got it. Now, where's my Smaland WG

Yeah when in fact you were probably reported by someone in your own team because they hate carriers and esp. that one. But keep telling yourself you're awesome dude :D

Ì would suggest anything thats not me.

Probably as mediocre of a sarcasm effort as OP's carrier play. 1/5 would not read again.

Totally credible. Because that 3%, even if that number is correct, has way too big of an influence on the game mechanics.

Posing as reasonable, together with Beast. Doesn't get any cuter then that :D

He asked why in this game.