Vanhal

Wg is not Britannia

I meant that the act of exchanging gold to silver is widely agreed to be the worst possible use of gold, and therefore sign of desperation at best. So expressing silver value in gold is the same. I have nothing against the method itself at it is obvious.

2. "Minor" nations tree are a myth. Expected since forever in WoT and still not here. Also, France and Italy navies were by no way "minor". 3.

When there is silver in the bundle, there is no actual point of calculate anything. Cause exchange gold to silver... The only place that worked was Japan... and only for the Namban.

Coście zrobili z moją ulubioną mapą? (Dwaj Bracia) Wyspy się przemieściły i teraz tam jest strzelnica dla niszczycieli. Do tego ustawienie wysp przy linii to zły pomysł, teraz to już wszyscy tamtędy pływają, przez co bitwa jest wolna.

There's not enough "u" in there. I propose we throw at least one extra "u" in every ship name. At least two in case of IJN ones. And seriously, ship name in caps are kinda rare, although it do happens sometimes. More often that the excess "u" anyway.

The patch notes changed few times in last few days. That skill was not changed... yet.

And the diverse ship names feature is still nowhere to be seen.

Well, handling of this game is indeed "special". Just not in the positive meaning of this word... EDIT:http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/35953-free-aurora-slot-3-days-premium-and-500000-credits/ See for yourself.

If you mean the Naval Action GUI that's still deep in the testing and probably not priority. At least i hope, because it looks fugly now

Ow. That big prow must be nice weak spot if the armor is indeed so weak.

Idk if the Pirates of the Burning Sea still exist, but that game delivered me tons of pirate actions. You may want to check it.

Like, yeah. And yet they whine about the Mikasa, of all things... NA also got 3 languages there, so while it is significant less than what we've got on EU they don't mention this like ever. Anyway, the language problem on EU is pointed out by WG employees constantly. So either it's only an excuse or WG is simply not willing to fix the problem or the company is in such mess that no one have control over situation anymore.

That's true, hope someone will also remove the pumpkins (or add the would-be astronomers autodafe as lightsource, just a little hope).

Seconded. But does it have the port too or only those icons and such?

No. Sometimes i wait quite a lot of time before that ship turn their side to me, and then he recieve 3 citadels and disappear. Or 2000 damage if RNG shows me middle finger *shrug*.

I've got a 100% win ratio on Kawachi. Kawachi OP as hell!

75 mm hull armor? Are cruisers able to pen this?

No, they have WR over 50% because of who sails them. Or you want to say based on this data that the Mikasa, Albany and Yubari are better on their tiers than the Tirpitz or Warspite?

You are awfully defensive about this. Having second thoughts about supporting bad business and trying to convince yourself? And you are not the victim here, you only try to portray yourself like one. The actual victims are players. Each and every one of us, even those that live in the pink illusion of being satisfied. Bad business means... well, anyone who is playing World of Warplanes now will know.

That. Closed beta was also more fun. No "battle" button fee and the costs themselves were around 2/3 of what it is now. That's how it should be. Anyway, if i remember correctly, we were told then that the income and maintenence cost would be not changed in the open beta and beyond. Only the xp and credit cost of the ships and modules would rise. But then they went bonkers and slapped +50% repair costs and the flat battle tax. Ugh. For a quick fix they could try changing how the costs and gains are counted. Deduct all the costs from the BATTLE revenue, not the overall treasury (excluding the premium consumables and camo). It would still be hard as hell to gain anything, but you at least wont go on minus. The grind to everything would still be there, but it at least would be standard (if harsh) double grind not this triple nonsense.

Meanwhile, on the asia server: https://asia.wargaming.net/shop/wows/

Ah no, it's not about that. If you want that, it's still not ok, but i don't see anything that i could say to you then (like the Greyshark). But i wanted to point that your words and actions are conflicting. I would like to know it too, but i'm afraid we won't get answer. First, because community managers won't post anything in such controversial thread, as they don't want to get attacked. Second, because they can't inform us, like the old Tirpitz release thread and now the polish Błyskawica thread suggest (that they know beforehand of the offers). And third, because WG absolutely WANT to keep us in the dark about this. Would you buy the bundle, even if you have no problems with them, if you know it would be available later on without it? Maybe because he don't know Russian? I would go instantly if i could, but playing game where 99% people use one language and you don't know is not pleasant. Oh, and your suggestion do feel slightly insulting.

[edited]

Don't have any proof of that, but from my experience, the most suitable word is "abysmal".