Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Vanhal

Alpha Tester
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    5,609

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    5569

Everything posted by Vanhal

  1. Vanhal

    Premium Shop Cycle

    Vanhal replied to ArcheonSRF's topic in General Discussion

    Begone devil!
  2. Vanhal

    Black Friday on EU server

    Vanhal replied to WWladCZ's topic in General Discussion

    In WoWs? Only big things here are disapointments (though i'm amazed everyone is apparently not used to this by now and still expects anything good).
  3. Vanhal

    The Karlsruhe is utter garbage because......

    Vanhal replied to VIChiefIV's topic in Cruisers

    Don't even compare this to the Furutaka. Furu, as it is now, have only one serious shortcoming, and it's not even its own - every other cruiser 5-6 tier have more range, and being outranged with its armor is dangerous.
  4. Vanhal
    Russian leaker. No consequence then. BB OP! Nerf BB! I present to you another ship apparently so advanced, that it is still in service: Most of the ship class in game never met one another. Anyway, it's kinda funny when people trashtalk soviet ships for being obsolete rustbuckets and then get butthurt when those obsolete ships built 10 yeras too late are implemented in the game. I guess one premium is easier to make than entire line? Yet the NA server is heavily butthurt over the Mikasa, probably worst ship in game? No chance, 50+ euro for sure.
  5. Vanhal
    It's something. Though they could make this codes at least a bit less different from invite codes to make their middle finger pointed at current players less pronounced.
  6. Vanhal

    Why ranked battles stats do not get displayed in players stats?

    Vanhal replied to Columbus_Columbonius's topic in Archive

    Maybe to avoid people falling into depression after looking at the 10% win ratio?
  7. Vanhal
    Do i really must remind anyone what is always happening to business and every other organizations that only want to hear yesmen? Edit: From NA, but just when i thought they can't be more ridiculous anymore, this happens: http://worldofwarships.com/en/news/common/best-buy-holiday-bundles/ Bloody really WG? Not only that is most absurd offer ever, but your genius marketing team can't count to 50 and don't even know what they are selling (Aurora at tier 4?)?
  8. Vanhal

    [IV] Ishizuchi

    Vanhal replied to Darayaharus's topic in Pancerniki

    Hmm. Nie sugerowałbym się tym, on otwarcie przyznaje, że nie lubi pancerników i nie czuje ich. Co bardzo zresztą widać zwłaszcza w dwóch fragmentach: 1. Podniecanie się olbrzymią skutecznością artylerii pomocniczej na Myogim i Ishi. Czy ten filmik nie jest czasem z closed bety? Wtedy ona jeszcze czasem służyła za coś więcej niż ozdobnik. 2. Kojarzenie Ishi z Kongo. Sądząc po gołych parametrach i opiniach powyżej jest to raczej ryzykowne. Jak dla mnie nie, nawet mając kupę dublonów specjalnie na zakup okrętów premium. 2500 to o wiele za dużo jak na przeciętny okręt (tutaj akurat się zgodzę z autorem filmiku, jest to najnudniejszy premium w grze) 4 tieru. O ile nie masz Murmańska, dołóż 500 i kup Murmańska. Jak masz Murmańska, kup konto premium (o ile chcesz kupić konto premium), albo zostaw i poczekaj, może coś nowego dadzą później. Do zarabiania też trochę bez sensu, podejrzewam że na zwykłym Kongo zarobi się więcej.
  9. Vanhal
    Wow, the right to insult someone, cowardly in the internet to boot as a free speech? Stretchy at best. And if punishing such childish behaviour is decline of human mind and logic, then i assume his behavior is opposite, namely the progress of human mind and logic? Weird. Once again, how the hell did you get the notion of punishing the immature, childish boor is violation of free speech? It's simply called socialisation. I admit, that nice spanking would be better, but unfortunately it's impossible on the intenet. What WG can and should do is simply hide away the toy he used to misbehave for some time. Oh, two more things. 1. This game is private property. There is no right to free speech here. Not that i'm very fond of it, but that's how the system works. 2. There is a rumor here: that this account may be compromised.
  10. Vanhal
  11. Vanhal
    As stupid as it may look, i do care. I really like this game.
  12. Vanhal

    Glad to see my premium expire

    Vanhal replied to Blackeon's topic in Off-Topic

    I can only say that noobs, while irritating, sometimes infuriating, are not a real problem. Sometimes you have them, sometimes the enemy.
  13. Vanhal
    It's very rude though. Such people need a few days of forced rest from the game. You don't insult random people on the street, do you?
  14. Vanhal
    If that happens, it will be too late for WoWs. Look at WoWp or, even more, at Navy Field 2. And considering the negative changes in WoT during the years and all crap we got served here right from the beginning as compared to WoT, WG won't wake up. Ever. Maybe now is the last call for WoWs, maybe not. I think the fate of this game would be decided definitely during next year though.
  15. Vanhal
    Roger that. So now at least two server personnel reported the problem, so i guess all we need to do is wait now and see what WG will do. I will vent some more in the meantime though
  16. Vanhal
    Yes i alredy know that. Wish somebody melt those glaciers though. Unless it's a outright middle finger. Even if not (i'm fairly sure it wasn't explicitly stated where those premiums be), i just couldn't imagine somebody could do the things they did at the OBT and later. That kind of business cesspit is even below the worst mobile fails like the Warhammer Quest PC port.
  17. Vanhal
    If even Rita stopped buying new tanks because of bundles, then you know that something is happening... Koreans! Yes, it's surprising, especially considering that Murmansk is superior in every possible meaning. Although probably the most imprtant is factor of Ishi being the battleship, only one available for most of the time. Even if it is 100% overpriced crap. Actually Murmansk is also 100% overpriced but it's not crap. And Mikasa was 400% overpriced if we compare it's base price to tier 2 planes (less with tanks).
  18. Vanhal

    World of Warships - Clans

    Vanhal replied to Akagi_Kai's topic in Archive

    Well, they are called very differently in various games - guilds, alliances and so on and on. Most games try to have names for player groups consistent with content. Actually, not counting WoT i never played in any game that had "clans" so it seems more tied with FPS titles. It seemed wrong in WoT too so i don't have much expectations to be changed here, but at least i can hope for some more immersion.
  19. Vanhal
    Well, good to know you've passed this. It's major concern considering the polls and kinda empty high tiers. Anyway, i'm sure you read those threads but then again from the first sentence it's not clear - it's not the problem that passive playing with low damage is causing loss of credits. It is threefold problem of game not rewarding good play, but punishing for less than awesome play: 1. Even playing with high damage, and even with premium is rewarded poorly 2. Active play is discouraged by very high repair cost, thus passive player is, unlike what you said, punished less. Average campfest is therefore more advantageous than good active play. 3. Flat fee for entering battle is yet another sensless punishment, and whatever it was intended to do it failed. Recent "rebalance" to economics worsened the situation even more.
  20. Vanhal
    Considering amount of feedback everywhere where people talk about WoWs, it is major issue. And it may not break game mechanics, but it cause WG to be percieved as greedy bastards, which in turn, like every negative PR can break the game itself. But its fixing indeed would not require constant updating. Just one move - give us choice. Or maybe a few more. I would have nothing against what you did with Ishizuchi and some tanks in WoT - premium shop first, ingame later. Just indicate your plans.
  21. Vanhal

    World of Warships - Clans

    Vanhal replied to Akagi_Kai's topic in Archive

    Just name them different. Clan bears this to mind: While the players in WoWs should at least imagine something like this: We may not have fully united accounts so there is no reason to have united clans, especially when someone plays more than one WG game.
  22. Vanhal

    We want lower repair costs too!

    Vanhal replied to Trigger_Happy_Dad's topic in General Discussion

    I just hope they can notice this befere all other players left the table. Getting empty game because it's crap like WoWp is one thing. Personally killing your own good game because greed and inept handling is another thing entirely.
  23. Vanhal

    We want lower repair costs too!

    Vanhal replied to Trigger_Happy_Dad's topic in General Discussion

    Hey, hey, look here: So, it's all an illusion. No problem here. Mass frigging hallucination. Learn to play noobs and don't bother us with such trifling "problems". While on NA that issue was at least finally noticed: http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/58356-wgna-communication-is-still-lacking-can-we-fix-it/page__st__20__pid__1428362#entry1428362
  24. Vanhal

    Patch Alert: Game Update 0.5.1.2

    Vanhal replied to IamTroublemaker's topic in General Discussion

    Well, they DID change the prices of few unreleased ships already - Nicolai, Błyskawica nd i think Tone went down, then Błyskawica was up again because of retiering. That's ofc totally different from getting the final release price for ingame shop.
  25. Vanhal

    We want lower repair costs too!

    Vanhal replied to Trigger_Happy_Dad's topic in General Discussion

    Two months. One for slowly noobing and losing my way up to T6 and then another to quickly lose to the T10. Average WR back then was around 43-45% i think, i was total noob. Another month later i had second T10 and few other lines at 7-8 tier. Here right now i have one T8 (not playing because it's is stressful to actually lose progress in game) and one T7. And while i indeed play much less than back then, your statement of "we are already advancing faster" is very puzzling in light of the desolated higher tiers. Could you perhaps mean that players are reaching the higher tiers but then are not playing them? That's true of course, but the way WG doing it by punishing economy is incredibly wrong. What would be good is players WANTING to play middle tier, not playing them because they DONT WANT to play upper tiers or are forced to do the second and especially third round of grind. Further ideas - events, missions, clan activities and so on for middle tiers. And, as i said many times, nobody here wants to get all for free with minimal or no effort. Most proposals are to make economy goes to eliminating the credits loss. We would still need to buy those 10+ million ships, and another 10 million in modules and upgrades. And to do this we would still play middle tiers and buy premium accounts (getting XP is no walk in park too, but it's way less issue due to never losing XP). And i personally don't think that even if impossible happened and gain/loss ratio was equal for all tiers the low and middle tiers would be empty.
×