Vanhal

True, but can you imagine the shitstorm if Scharn/Gneis would be premium only? I wanted them too, but not like this. And this explanation added insult to injury. Nah, i'm not feeding you anymore.

According to their [edited]explanation "logic", torps on a BB are a big no-no, if players can't handle different guns on a BB, their heads will instantly explode from the torps on said BB.

Holy [edited], you really called me fanboy? Man, you are even worse than during closed beta.

Bo zwalniają, trzeba się przyzwyczaić. Trening na Myogim czyni cuda w tym względzie Ponoć Iowa ma już normalniejsze.

It would only be disaster if they made it really underpowered. But, in that case, it would be just next XP sink, we got them enough on all possible tiers, so it surely wouldn't be disaster for WG, only for the unfortunate guys who will go there first and get their teeth broken. But tell me honestly, looking at WG premium ship philosophy, do you really, honestly, expect Scharnhorst guns to be UP on 7 tier? Why the players cannot be given a choice then? Unless WG ALREADY KNOWS that 6x380 is worse than 9x283. Next, any player that will get so much trouble adjusting to the minor change of gun caliber, just shouldn't play this, as he is then way below the one trick pony. Or maybe WG will block players from playing different classes until they reach end of the line in one class? And finally, that "explanation" is pure [edited]and worsened the case a lot. Well, maybe it is real for those below 40% WR.

To, co oni tam napisali to woła o pomstę do nieba, nie dość, że kompletne bzdury, to jeszcze traktują graczy (właściwie to Ruskich, bo to im napisali na forum), jak totalnych kretynów. Tak na szybko: 1. O biedactwa, kaliber im się zmieni i taktyka też. Jakoś przy mieszaniu ciężkich i lekkich krążowników o tym nie myślą. Ruskie drzewko jest na ten przykład kompletnie ok. A... co jeśli ktoś zechce na ten przykład nie grać cały czas jedną linią, tylko poza pancernikami gra jeszcze niszczycielami? Albo, o zgrozo, lotniskowcami? Przecież taka zmiana taktyki z 283 na 380 to pryszcz w porównaniu z różnicami pomiędzy klasami. Wylew, zawał i udar z miejsca, tak się czerep przegrzewa. I perełka na koniec, przeciwnicy mają 406, więc to będzie odpychające. No już nie mogę, jak troska o gracza. Ciekawe ile się za to odpychających Scharnhorstów sprzeda i co to ma wspólnego z wałkowanym nawet nie od miesięcy tylko od lat tematem 283 i powtarzającą się ciągle konkluzją, że bardzo wielu graczy chciałoby chociaż spróbować, jak to będzie na tym 7 tierze. No i oczywiście, że będą mogli, kupując premkę za pewnie koło 140-150 zeta! 2. Znów bzdury. Mogami był problemem tylko i wyłącznie ze względu na gówniany balans spowodowany nie przez krasnoludki tylko przez nieudolność i brak pomyślunku developerów. Było wałkowane mnóstwo razy, więc się nie będę powtarzał. 3. Smutne sranie w banie. Klonów na premce jest więcej niż unikatów. Byłoby jeszcze więcej, jakby nie brak normalnych linii. A akurat mam wrażenie, że granie z 6 działami będzie bardziej unikatowe niż z 283mm, w sensie wspomnień z Myogiego. Pytanie tylko, dlaczego Gneisenau z 380 nie jest premką? Wystarczy przejrzeć duży i stary wątek o okrętach i wcześniejsze info ciągnące się sprzed alfy, że wszyscy jak leci spodziewali się wydania tych dwóch okrętów w takich właśnie konfiguracjach, tylko że odwrotnie.

With only 6 guns, with dispersion like Tirpitz to boot, Gneisenau will be mostly anti-player-patience. And it just don't work like that, penetration is, and always was, inferior stat in WoWs compared to RoF, especially among same class of ships, with only notable difference being Yamato and Warspite due to overmatch mechanics. Unless Scharnhorst guns will be totally crap with AP bouncing BB's from every angle or truly abhorrent accuracy, Scharn will be massively better than Gneisenau starting another OP premium vs UP regular ship tree, especially that they are ships of one class, not even comparable to most classic Atago/Mogami case. WG seems to really shooting itself in the foot this time. I get and agree that balance>history, but this is clear as hell example of money>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>balance>history. And this may even piss some players not to buy Scharnhorst.

Remembering how Karlsruhe guns performed, that sounds horrible.

Reporting bots for being bots is like playing mage in WoW and turning sheep into sheep.

Even left as it is i would want to get 12 vs 12 in co-op. Those 8 vs 8 most of the time feels like WoWp - battle itself is shorter than loading+getting in range.

Ok, then i will ask about EU server: How many battles played, in % or numbers (preferably both), are Co-op battles? And how many players, also in % and total numbers, have more than 50% of their battles in Co-op mode? I am genuinely interested in that numbers, and i believe EU staff should also be.

I predict that both of them will be spammy, but it's worth trying anyway.

http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/31444-some-interesting-info-from-ru/page__st__2080__pid__955000#entry955000 Russian source: Now give me back my 30 minutes of life Or lose your own 90 minutes (at least) trying to watch that source

RU info thread.

Actually, probably close to 100% players play both. Those 30% play MAINLY PvE. Yeah, when bastion was first rumored few months ago i was totally thinking it was something for PvE. Instead we've got ultra-rare and (probably, as i never seen it, even on test) insignificant addon to one map and one tier. Please notice this isn't World of Warcraft and you would be wise to abstain from trying to transplant the flame war from there. Especially that there isn't any reason to flame, even in WoW, not to mention WoWs. Expanding PvE content would be beneficial to all players and the WG too.

It's so big, it would have 40 fires simultaneously. But only 80k HP, Grosser Kurfurst and Colorado clearly showed us that HP have nothing to do with displacement.

One question. Can you make it so we can install more than one custom port? Like for example, change the Yokosuka and New York at the same time?

Nobody use it. WG must simply hate it on principle, as it can be decently made, just look at AW. That's why i'm telling them for ages to do something with it. Either remove it, force everyone on the equal ground in pvp and end this pitiful farce it currently is, or put some work into it and make it at least somewhat viable. They promised better PvE later in this year in RU Q&A but since they can't even deliver staple stuff like ship lines, i highly doubt if this will ever materialize.

According to WG itself, 30% of players play only or mainly PvE. I wouldn't be surprised if that number were dropping very fast, as WG completely ignores them and did absolutely nothing to make this mode more appealing than the current castrated training room with harsh penalties.

It's packaged into the WG account. All three games + paranoia.

Yeah, there was some talk. That was only talk though, we don't have any separate modes. Also, we don't even have predreadnoughtS, because apparently Mikasa is so hard to balance WG don't even want to try or test. I would think that 30% of players mostly or only playing PvE would get some attention from WG by now, but apparently not.

Yamato is indeed a bit different than Mikasa. Now you could ponder the difference between Scharnhorst, Richelieu and Bismarck in the context of game balancing, and it would probably came the same as expected by mostly everyone. I wouldn't mind Richelieu at T7 though, but i know it's impossible.

The AA seems really shitty, not even one VI tier plane shot down? Also, that dispersion when he shot Atlanta...

Yup. Plus the amount and anger of whining in this thread is perplexing. Looks just like Pavlov's dogs reflex "rrrrring! aim-assist!"

I always thought Vanguard would be very underarmed but durable premium tier VIII. Would work as regular tier 8 with modernisation of 15" guns. Making it tier IX would require fictional upgrade to perhaps 8x16" (Lion guns).