-
Content Сount
5,609 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
5569
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Vanhal
-
Już go kończę i imo bije na głowę wszystkie pancerniki 4 tieru jakimi grałem (czyli wszystkie poza impregnatorem), zarówno wynikami jak i przyjemnością z gry. EDIT: karma to suka a Murphy świnia. Napisałem powyższą laurkę 15 minut temu, zagrałem nim bitwę i w tej bitwie Bogue zrzucił mi jedną torpedę, ze swojego jedynego ocalałego samolotu torpedowego. Detonacja z full HP...
-
12p captain is good for sure. Campletown? Don't know but it's looking very weak and uninteresting.
-
Campbeltown... No, really, the mission is reasonable in this timeframe, tier 3 premium as a reward is passable too. But it's Campbeltown Oh, well, at least the captain is better than my current on a Warspite, so i'll still do it. Thanks WG i suppose.
-
Awesome. Would totally play that as proper mode.
-
Szkoła?
-
Oh, how weird this game turned out.
-
You are going to by lynched for that post
-
Aha, dzięki za uściślenie, myślałem że chodzi o naprawę cytadel, co Warspite miał lepsze niż inne okręty ale mu to akurat zabrali.
-
WG response regarding recent (now expired) temporary repair cost reduction for high tiers?
Vanhal replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
I asked the same question in Polish Q&A and got answered... sort of: I means, in my lousy translation: "Income generated by high tiers is working as designed. In my understanding earning ends at tier VIII, and IX and X turns even in average battle. I must add that colleague with whom i played yesterday (me on Shimakaze, he on Gearing) made 600.000 credits income without premium, which turned approximately 300.000 pure profit" So as you can see, it is not official WG stance, and it better not be because it is dismissive, subjective and false (that part that IX and X comes even on average battle). EDIT: Just do it, Ev1n. It would make game much more bearable overall.- 14 replies
-
- WG
- Repair cost
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
A ma? Przecież zmienili to jakiś czas temu i już się nie różni chyba od pozostałych.
-
Balancing by consumables, is it a good idea?
Vanhal replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
Better idea than balancing by turret traverse, but still not good, consumables are not really reliable enough. -
So where is the IJN BB's armor model review/refresh like US ones did - and also mikasa state as WG staff
Vanhal replied to t0ffik1's topic in General Discussion
Write that 100 times and maybe you will believe it Mikasa is beautiful but its performance is completely pathetic compared to most tier 2 ships. -
That's the worst thing i ever read about the Dunkerque.
-
Good news. Also, correlation between more battleships and game suddenly stopping decline is obvious
-
A way for [EU]-players to earn commemorative flags without having to resort to buying bundles. Like the NA has?
Vanhal replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
And it's the fugliest flag in existence in this game, my eyes bleed every time i look at it, so i don't even use it. Yes, he apparently again made outrageous criminal entitled whiny etc. etc. demand of getting same treatment as the other server. Unbelivable outlandish shocking etc. etc. hutzpah. Any proof of that? -
How nice to dismiss real problem with derogatory comment. Don't like those threads? Deal with it or don't read them.
-
Nah, i'll pass.
-
Nie chcę nic mówić, ale jedynym pancernikiem który może ominąć wyspę w momencie otrzymania informacji o wyspie jest Mikasa i to też nie każdą Jako bonus spróbuj tej sztuczki na Izumo.
-
- 28 replies
-
- Battleships
- MM
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Wipeouts? Are you per chance playing co-ops without premium?
-
Your pick for favourite famous potential tier 8 Battleship
Vanhal replied to Affeks's topic in Battleships
Notice that WG balancing by turret traverse is complete unfun nonsense. Everything in game is much faster - ships, torps, planes, shells. Only turrets are not. Even more, IRL turret traverse didn't mean much, considering how the engagements looked. Here we got constantly changing course, WASD hax moments, torpedobeats, wiggling, brawls. And the turrets just don't manage with this. And what you would put on 9 if the only applicable real project will be made redundant by putting it on 8? I vote for Impero. Of course the class in tree would be most probably named Vittorio Veneto, as quite lots of sources calls the entire class this name. But i would still like the Impero, even as premium. And it wasn't finished, so WG could use their fantasy a little.- 59 replies
-
No gold unification forthcoming -- its official
Vanhal replied to Babykim's topic in General Discussion
Problem with armor is that it isn't balanced against gold ammo (and how it could be? no chance, and it shouldnt even be, that's the point of gold ammo). And since they are selling gold ammo for credits, half of random use it even on low tiers. It isn't fun to drive tank balanced towards powerful armor like Black Prince, which is paid heavily in bad speed and weak gun, to still be frontally whacked by some puny cromwell guns or so. Gold ammo for credits was what effectively ended WoT for me. Worst thing ever implemented. -
So it's either ok or WG have some weird definition of 100%?
- 28 replies
-
- Battleships
- MM
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
No gold unification forthcoming -- its official
Vanhal replied to Babykim's topic in General Discussion
Wait what? Does that mean armored tanks could use their armor once more and not see middle gold finger from every gold spamming cromwell and such? -
Your pick for favourite famous potential tier 8 Battleship
Vanhal replied to Affeks's topic in Battleships
If you meant that with 12x380 it will be good for tier IX. Everything except German BB's can be cited in broadside, Germans would take heavy damage from sheer number of shots, and if Dunkerque guns with 35% fire chance are any indication for the future (which i hope they are not, but WG loves the HE way too much to have real hope), the angled ships would suffer too. Especially if they give it some reasonable RoF, historical was up to 2,2rpm but i would rather see 2,4(and Dunkerque RoF should be buffed too). Depend on Strasbourg placement. French pre-Dunkerque BB's seems like many-big-crappy guns ideas. Courbet look fit for tier 3, though i bet better gun placement would be balanced by WG favourite atrocious turret traverse. Bretagne similarities to new York and König just scream "tier 5", although if the guns are crappy it would be good for tier 4. Then Normandie at 5, with the same guns. Lyon at 6 with 16 of the same guns... depend on which variant of gun placement they would choose, i guess the most awkward one, because f### you Izumo. Strasbourg on 7? There just aren't much choice in the French ships, although they do have nice straight line of ship progression from 3 to 9 tier. Anyway, lets not forget the modifications, stock hulls on most BBs with old WWI guns and shells are trash.- 59 replies
