Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Vanhal

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    5,609
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    5569

Everything posted by Vanhal

  1. So that's why my battleship is reloading it's guns in 3 seconds. Except it's somehow not happening. Compared to indeed 10 times faster torps reload on high tier DD's, or way way faster than 10 times refueling and rearming of plane squadrons... In other words, not only realism but also just any even remote contact with realism is not relevant for balancing.
  2. Vanhal

    Some HUGE GUNS

    What is better than bigger guns? More of them of course:
  3. Vanhal

    German ship stats

    If i remember correctly from CBT this module was available on tiers IX and X. On the other hand premium Arkansas Beta on tier IV also can mount it. That torp are indeed intriguing. Could be nasty surprise to other BB's and even unlucky DD's. Especially considering shitty secondaries range. Reading that i actually started to regain some interest, possibly even big, as turret traverse is most painful and deterring thing for me in this class since like forever. Especially that it's been nerfed multiple times. WG clearly like to force our battleships to sail in straight lines (seriously, try maneuvers on New York, it's pure pain). No, i won't mount the turret upgrade, RoF reigns supreme.
  4. Vanhal

    German ship stats

    Of course you are right, but remember than most IJN cruisers torps are borderline useless on middle-high tiers and WG numerous times said that they have worse stats than USN cruisers exactly because they have torps to "compensate". Poks. I rapidly start to lose interest. Could be some usual name like Moltke. most fitting, considering 3rd Reich would be Ludendorff
  5. That would be plausible if it was true. Unfortunately, we kinda don't see any balance changes to other classes (at least yet), so you can hardly say about "design attitude". And amount of whining on forum must reach absolute critical mass to get to WG and have some effect. This happened only twice - when aim-mod was blocked and when CV nerfs were canceled. This one here is not only very indirect nerf, but also incredibly minor, as that skill is basically useless.
  6. Vanhal

    German ship stats

    Most probably because balancing Tirpitz torpedoes.
  7. Yet you post entire new thread to whine about it...
  8. Vanhal

    Carriers Getting Rediculious

    EDIT: scratch this, this thread is pure troll feeding ground, i'm not taking part
  9. Vanhal

    Bonus Codes!

    And now it starts a new career as negrep farm.
  10. Vanhal

    Błędy w grze

    Nie, napisałem 1500 postów trollingu, obrazków z kotami i pakowania epena statami (no dobra, trolling i koty się zdarzały, ale nie aż tyle). Po prostu nie uważam, żeby opinia kogokolwiek poza supertesterami i ewentualnie graczami z RU (i to nawet nie oskarżając WG o bycie Rosjanami, bo tak się składa ze są Rosjanami i zgadnijcie jakie forum czytają, jeśli w ogóle?) miała większe znaczenie dla WG na tym etapie. Choćby minimalistycznie zwracając uwage, że jest tychże opinii teraz za dużo. O tym, że open beta "testerzy" są zwyczjnie mięchem nabijającym bezcenne statystyki nie wspomnę. Bo wiem, że w alfie czytali. I czasem nawet się widziało tego efekty. EDIT: I nawet nie dla darmowej łajby. Rzecz jasna dla DWÓCH darmowych łajb!
  11. Vanhal

    Błędy w grze

    Sorki, ale to za dużo jak dla mnie
  12. Vanhal

    [IV] Myōgi

    Tak czytałem co napisałeś i myślałem, że do tego potrzebowałeś jeszcze jakiś środków psychoaktywnych, ale potem doszedłem do "MM, który mnie uwielbia". Oj to owszem. Ja tam zdecydowanie wolałem Wyominga, gdzie ilość (strzałów) czasami potrafiła przejść w jakość. Bo rozmieszczenie dział to na 4 i 5 tierze japońskie BB mają o niebo lepsze. I w dodtku szybciej się obracają, na Nowym Jorku to można jajo znieść. Szybkość też się przydawała, można uciec, można taranować. Czytaj chłopie dokładniej, ja nie pisałem o sobie, tylko o tym biedaku do którego się przyczepiłeś że nie napisał czegoś, co jednak napisał. A jak dla mnie znośny zasięg to jest dla pancernika minimum 15 km. Rewelacyjny jest powyżej 20. Nie dlatego, żeby przy obecnej klątwie RNG dało się skutecznie walczyć na taką odległość, ale im większy zasięg, tym skuteczniejszy jest ogień na średnim dystansie 12-15 kilometrów, gdzie odbywa się większość strzelania.
  13. Vanhal

    20 minutes , just NOT ENOUGH!

    Yes i know what you meant. I just say that won't happen because most of the people play to fight and shoot, right now, the "cautious" end game happens almost never, even in the moment it is plausible. And the team having advantage also almost never back up from the fight. What i do often seen is when the people realise it will be a draw anyway, they just give up on further fight.
  14. Vanhal

    Premium economy

    Without premium i guess you will earn more credits on Murmansk than Atago, as Murmansk is easier to play successfully and repair cost won't hamper the earnings even if you fail to do anything. Repair cost should be 0 (zero) on premium ships anyway.
  15. Vanhal

    Premium economy

    You are really suggesting that borderline obscure feature most people don't even use is good reason to justify castrating of premium ships most important one?
  16. Vanhal

    20 minutes , just NOT ENOUGH!

    Unless all your team are US BB's and all of enemy team are fast cruisers and destroyers, that's not going to happen. And if this happens, the Minekazes won't hide. Oh, they won't, the will eat you BB's (and we still are talking about the enemy superior numbers). And even in one on a million times it will happen as you said, that's too weird to even discuss seriously.
  17. Vanhal

    20 minutes , just NOT ENOUGH!

    If you can't kill even one of few ships in such situation, you either: 1. Lost already, as the enemy have the advantage. No reason whatsoever for them not to push this advantage. 2. Deserve to lose. Well, i don't meant there are many draws, because there are not. But Every. Single. One. Is so infuriating that they need to be gone.
  18. Vanhal

    20 minutes , just NOT ENOUGH!

    It is enough. What SHOULD be changed is the standard battle mode, just as domination was changed. NO MORE DRAWS.
  19. Vanhal

    Bismarck

    Voted "no" on both: 1. It's obvious. 2. Since first question was about Bismarck, i assumed by "German Navy" OP meant Kriegsmarine. So also no, no one thought of it as the force that was able and should challenge the Royal Navy in decisive battle.
  20. If you are bad player, that's it. If you plan to achieve any success, there's positioning, need for precise movement, predicting everything at least 3+ minutes ahead, steel nerves under fire, repair management, not demolishing your own computer watching glacial turret movement. Shooting... Indeed, once you get how to lead shots it's little beyond that. Spray and pray. Certainly not the players fault though. Not exciting, being all about the defence. So my ranking is: 1. Battleships 2. Destroyers 3. Cruisers 4. Carriers
  21. Vanhal

    CV Speed against CAs, and hunting 2 CVs.

    Let's see: Indeed, no "realism" word, but the terms like "Looking down at history" and thus "having CVs being hard to take on with lone cruisers is kind of WAD" not to mention the entire context are speaking of what, science fiction? By history you mean the history of Narnia or Middle-Earth of course? And those flying camels would behave like real planes or turning on a dime like ingame ones? Not to mention instant squadron rearming & refueling. Short torpedo reloads. Maneuvers some ships can make. Invisible destroyers on 6 km. Short range of all guns, especially AA and secondaries. Short range of torps. Double scale of ships and rest of the world. Health points. Damage model. And so on. Good sir, what we have now is exactly flying camels and laser guns and slime missiles and pieces of cake. Just modeled and textured so it would resemble warships.
  22. Vanhal

    How to play Myogi?

    Same here. Myogi itself was worse, but the BB's got nerfhammered so much in 0.4.0 that overall it's way worse now.
  23. Vanhal

    plz remove two brothers map

    I don't agree with you, only ships that can have real problem there are US BB, rest is ok. What i would like to change in maps: 1. More maps. Really we need many more of them, especially that they are kinda easier to make than WoT ones. 2. Redesign Ice Islands - remove half of the icebergs and spread the rest a bit more. 3. Shrink the islands on Fault line or spread them, this is not Maginot line. 4, MOST IMPORTANT, SO IN CAPITAL LETTERS - REMOVE THE SPLITTING OF THE TEAMS IN HOT SPOT. The map is kinda ok, but in every single battle one entire team roflstomps hallf of the other team, then the remaining half is doomed already. It's terribly boring, even when winning.
  24. Vanhal

    Torpedos should get a guidance system

    Also duds. Duds everywhere.
  25. Vanhal

    CV Speed against CAs, and hunting 2 CVs.

    WAD? Maybe, but don't use "realism" keyword as it is always bullcrap in WoWs. Want realistic CV's? Let's give them realistic time of preparing strike for example. Or maybe 1000km x 1000km maps? And so on and on and on. Same about rest of the classes. Drop the "realism" act it's only being used to whine about desired buffs/nerfs.
×