Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Vanhal

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    5,609
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    5569

Everything posted by Vanhal

  1. Vanhal

    Best credit grinder.

    Battleships are meh. Omaha after patch will be absolute beast.
  2. Vanhal

    OK, seriously now WG.

    I'm not arguing about the price itself. What is really bad is the bundle. I just don't see how the difference in price between the bundled crap and Tirpitz alone can justify loss of sales AND the angry potential clients. Could be easy to check - put the -8% bundle and at the same time not discounted Tirpitz alone. Check the difference, not piss the people and so on.
  3. Vanhal

    [V] Omaha

    Że Omaha jest świetna to wiadomo, ale ta Twoja "ściana ognia" to z dykty jest. Chyba że pisałeś z punktu widzenia świeżego Langleya.
  4. For once i fully agree with you. Btw. can you point me to a source of this +50%?
  5. Vanhal

    Some more EU stats

    Let's bet, what would WG do: 1. Nerf Iowa or 2. Buff Izumo
  6. Vanhal

    Tirpitz on sale tomorrow Sat29th

    AFAIK no, premium camos (when they are in default that is) don't have any effect, it's just visuals, you must buy normal camo for normal effect, like in any other ship.
  7. Vanhal

    Tirpitz on sale tomorrow Sat29th

    That's seriously first camo in this game that i do like. Most of the others look like the ship was after sea sickness puke festival. That i do not envy you.
  8. Vanhal

    Tirpitz Video Review with iChase :)

    Remember advent calendar? 99 euro for tier III tank with "some extras? Yeah...
  9. Vanhal

    Tirpitz Video Review with iChase :)

    Yes, i know that the Mikasa is very crappy for even tier II, with base price at 2000 gold (lol that's already almost 3x price of tier II tank in WoT or over 4 times the price of tier II plane in WoWp) and it was THE worst offer ever with excess junk for total 20 euro. But the NA forum is still unhappy they didn't had it.
  10. Vanhal

    [VIII] Tirpitz

    Też go miałem i mnie też nie przekonał, i nie chodzi o ten tak potępiany mały zasięg, tylko jego obrót wież zakrawał na kpinę. A co do jego zmiany, to tak: 1. Ninja buffy na premce? Wargaming? Niemożliwe, jakby bufnęli, to by się tym chwalili pod niebiosa, jak teraz z Yubari. 2. Cała ta zmiana opinii może wynikać z globalnego nerfa dla pancerników w 0.4.0, który możliwe że nie dotkął Warspite'a tak bardzo - zwrotność, RNG, artyleria pomocnicza, wprowadzenie amerykańskich pancerników (to rzecz jasna wcześniej niż w 0.4.0), dla których Warspite był bardzo wyraźnie balonem próbnym. Generalnie uważam, że to nie Warspitem teraz gra się lepiej, a reszta pancerników dostała nerfa, co oznacza, że na ich tle bardzo przeciętny Warspite nagle wyglada lepiej. Co do Tirpitza to też wygląda zachęcająco (zwłaszcza ten obrót wież, jak dla mnie najgorsza bolączka pancerników) i nawet mam na niego odłożone już w sumie of marca pieniądze, ale bardzo możliwe że go jednak nie kupię, bo biorąc pod uwagę, jak WG nakręca publiczność (i pamiętając Mikasę), sprzedaż wiązana w tym przypadku będzie pewnie po prostu obrzydliwa.
  11. Vanhal

    Farewell to Summer - x2

    Apparently is the same reason that we cant have premium ships or equipment demounting at the same prices as in WoT.
  12. Vanhal

    Farewell to Summer - x2

    Funny thing, the NA forum guys were fuming all the time how the game was exactly what they wanted, so their server pop will be very high, because warships are hugely popular in USA, way more than tanks. OBT came, and all is exactly as always, NA server have the least population with the best events. Oh, waiiit... they didn't get the Worst Deal Ever that was Mikasa. So now the tinfoil hats are on and the WG officially hates the NA and is taking revenge for the HumbleBundle flop (remind me, which server get the HB and in consequence almost free Murmansk?). Or so they say. WG should just drop the "different servers, different teams" crap and just make one team with one events for all (just account for the timezones), as this is getting beyond boring now. unless they enjoy the flame and want to play in divide et impera in they own little playground.
  13. Vanhal

    [VIII] Tirpitz

    Nie bardzo wiem, jak mam to rozumieć, wycofano go po kilku dniach open bety dopiero przecież, a z patchem 0.4.0 oberwał jak zresztą wszystkie pancerniki od zwiększonego RNG i nerfa artylerii pomocniczej...
  14. Vanhal

    [VIII] Tirpitz

    Nie, to znaczy, że będzie tak jak Warspite, przez dłuższy czas będą go wyciągać raz na ruski czas w "specjalnych" ofertach typu "Tirpitz + pierdyliard nikomu niepotrzebnych rzeczy" za 150 ojro w sprzedaży przez 4 dni "kupuj bo potem nie będziesz miał już okazji". Po dłuższym okresie, jak już świeżością będzie przypominał zdechłą rybę a jego miejsce w sprzedaży wiązanej zajmie nowa premka, wtedy dadzą go do sklepu za kasę, a przy odrobinie szczęścia może nawet do gry, oczywiście nerfiąc przy okazji, bo nie może tak być żeby odciągał kasę od świeżego towaru. Ha. Ha. Ha. O święta naiwności.
  15. Vanhal

    0.4.1 Public test 3

    Well, i always used the opportunity to test premium tanks in WoT. I bought a lot of them afterwards. This is apparently not wanted by WG, so we have low gold in test, and ingame gold shop is always way back after the cash shop, if we would ever get the premiums to buy ingame.
  16. Vanhal

    0.4.1 Public test 3

    It wasn't rumour mill. It was official release announcement on the website, with date included.
  17. Vanhal

    Snapshot stats of the EU server

    That's perhaps some very vocal players defend their sealclubbing 9-10 tier CVehicles with such zeal and ardor so the rest got used to the thought that ALL CV captains will do anything do keep their toys OP. Which is statistically not true, but on the forum we see only the besieged fortress syndrome guys. As you said, WG will always do what number suggest. But the incredibly slow pace of patching this game is making impression that the don't care at all. Basically this. Reducing the RNG a bit and, most importantly, lessening the negative impact of economy on gameplay would be good too. Most probably. Sealclubbers will need a bit of patience to lay in trap for they poor 7-8 tier prey. One thing surprised me - low position of Cleveland in the shooting down planes. Thanks for your work. Statistics is not the black magic, especially when WG staff actively refuse to acknowledge player's feedback as not having base in statistic they won't show us.
  18. Vanhal

    Why are Battleships so insanely weak ?

    Yes. That's precisely what they should do, angled enemy, even cruiser is practically invulnerable to citadel hits, even though they are theoretically possible. But mostly theoretically, as RNG and dispersion meant that shooting in the ship prow or bow is rather futile. So that's what you do - you wait for them to turn, as almost no one think of ramming. One salvo at side, even without citadel is 2-3x more damaging than shooting water around incoming ship. Ofc if he rams you or shoot torps from point blank you are screwed, but that's the life in open beta. And when we speak about non-angled enemy, it's also true. BB can shoot at 20km? No matter, every apologist would say "close to 10 km". So again, yes, BB are weak and not living up to their potential and those people think it's ok, just because BB are still kinda playable and not utter rubbish. Going further there, even if BB range will be nerfed to 5 km and their accuracy to 10%, it would also be ok; "close to 5 km", "git gud" and so on. Oh, adding insult to injury, before open beta normal accuracy for BB was 30-35%. Whole 10% higher, and even then BB were not OP. Again, noticing bad state of things is not the same as accepting it as good and normal. So they come here to see their "wow factor" and step on landmines called Kawachi and South Carolina. What do the do? Get out. Perhaps because they think that if powerfull BB are such rubbish, other classes are even worse. Fortunately (?) they notice cruisers owning them left and right (not to mention CV's), and then "wtf, is BB the weakest class?" And i can't stress this enough: GAME SHOULD BE FUN ON ALL TIERS It's not work, it's not chore. Thinking how people must "endure" and "work" to get to the place when the GAME is becoming fun (Colorado?) is so wrong i can't even express that properly without BBV nuking my post. This isn't even about BB being UP, what's most wrong here is they are simply NOT FUN.
  19. Vanhal

    Tirpitz Video Review with iChase :)

    With the way they treat their pixels like the finite and rare resource, that hype train is now way beyond ridiculous. Also, see what happen on the NA server with this and the Mikasa.
  20. Vanhal

    Is Patch 4.1 hitting EU on the 26th also?

    You will be anyway. Best case, you would have another sealclubbers div in your team and pray yours is stronger. I seriously doubt new MM will balance current situation when average cruisers tier is higher than BB and there are way more of them so there are low tier BB's in every battle (hello Kawachi, meet 3 omahas and a minekaze!).
  21. You know, after few months i played in WoT. With KV2. OMFG, how fast was this thing, its turret turns like a blazing lightning, its reload fast as thought, its accuracy perfect. I immediately turned off the WoT and back to New York in WoWs. Like awakening from a good dream.
  22. Vanhal

    Credits from WOT?

    Would be also good to get gold's WORTH, not only number.
  23. Torps and planes would be even more hit if this would resemble real engagement. DD would be absolutely unplayable, CA would burn. BB would rule the seas for 3 hours that would take CV to attack
  24. No, they don't. They do need buff, but not like this.
×