BrusilovX

I originally input just the 1st code and in-game the second mission just appeared when it became available without having to put the second code in. The third mission also 'just appeared' this morning without me adding any further codes.

Thanks

I've not played this operation before and I'm trying to find as much about it before I join in. Was it run for higher tiers last time? I've seen TIX games on YouTube.

At this time of day with 10,920 players 'in game' that may not be a big surprise. I'd try doing that in the evening where there are 20K players.

I guess the only way to complete this mission is to team up and do another of the operations?

The server is up and you can play.

I think you need to go through the first couple of levels in the campaign first.

Stage 3 has appeared. The mission is to get 15 captured/assisted in capture/defended ribbons. The reward is ten (10) November Echo Setteseven flags

If someone types A&B then at least it starts a dialogue - other players (even non English speakers) can suggest other caps just by suggesting other combinations. No, I don't propose a 5 minute (or longer) debate at the start of a game - players can usually change direction if they've started to go to the 'wrong cap'. At least then there is a chance, however small, that the team can have a small amount of co-ordination. I agree that it's best to support the DDs and where they go.

It's the first time I've read about someone quitting a game after a decent win rate for the day.

The other thing to point out that by a team going for all three caps (in the OPs example) it means that if there is a single CV there is less chance of having plane coverage on the caps when you need it. I've been in games where the concencus seems to be for instance again using the OP's example to go to B&C yet there are BBs or a CA that decides to go to A and then demands support once they are there and find a number of enemy ships at the cap and then calls the rest of the team potatoes for not following them. I understand players may not understand English but seeing B&C in chat should indicate that those may be the caps that the team is going to go for - even looking at the mini map should reveal that going to A is to be lonely (I've found that at times when I go ahead in a BB that the team behind me have all run off).

Yes, thanks for posting this suggestion.

Unfortunately, that won't happen - it was clarified in another thread. The captains remain trained to the ship they've been trained in (so if you have a captain trained on the Gallant and you put them on the Lightning after the patch they will be in the Lightning but still trained for the Gallant). See this thread: I started to read that thread and put my Gallant captain into the Lightning and then after continuing to read the thread found that I had wasted my time.

Thanks for posting this information. I look forward to the day that WG hire a professional proof reader (English speaker) to ensure these inaccuracies are avoided.

Same here - I can see it saving time.

I had one earlier for the main game (it was a pre-download I presume for the patch) and I just launched the Public Test version and there is one update for that. I don'r run the two versions from the same game centre. I did not have any updates to the Game Centre itself - just the game.

As soon as I read the OPs first post I knew how this thread would run. They can't see that when playing in a division (with equally bad players) would result in a better win rate than when playing solo - despite them getting the W/L ratio wrong in both cases. Then putting down anyone that suggests this should be expected. I'm not sure the claim that they were in the beta test of WoWS is correct - although it could simply be that they did not have enough battles in that.

It's just part of the package - captain trainer or way to get more elite XP is another advantage. Having said that I would not buy a second of any of those ships - I do admit to having the Kamikaze and Kamikaze R though. I hope to unlock the Boise via the missions as well

How was it resolved?

I only have 98.

Is it a log in problem or a connection problem? I logged onto the EU server a few minutes ago and had no problems. I presume you have followed the following: https://eu.wargaming.net/support/en/products/wows/article/10196/ There is a link in there to produce a PingPlotter report.

Do you have a replay file - some people may be able to spot if your AA is taken out.

If I have multiple sets to fire I'll put one set at the predicted location (taking into account if the ship is turning), another set 'long' and another set 'short'. This can't be done with DDs with only one set though - the Kidd and Cossack come to mind. I will usually manually select the target using the 'X' but there are times that the ship I want to target is not selected - usually when there are multiple targets in the area.

No, I've done all the missions in random. I've not changed my playstyle to achieve the missions either which may mean that it takes me longer to get those achievements. I know many players have complained that some DDs have essentially suicided in order to get the 'potential damage' achievements - it's supposed to be potential damage and not actual damage taken. If I've been playing any DD other than an IJN one you tend to be spotted frequently and maneouver to avoid the shots. Even an IJN DD gets spotted and targeted though. Co-op does not give much in the way of XP and credits compared to randoms. If I ever started to play CVs (I did try it in the beta but didn't like it) I'd play some co-op games then.

No, the post that they had caps lock on has been removed by the moderator. You can see this by a subsequent post by another person (post #22 by NothingButTheRain) where the post as been quoted but has been replaced by an 'edited' tag - you can sse the thread had already been resurected (the thread had appeared as a recently replied to thread to me).