cherry2blost

Well having been around the game a LOT longer than you OP... I do believe that my knowlege of the mechanics is probably far in excess of your own ! Well, those of us that do have the above are more than able to carry hard... Kami 5.4 spotting and epic torps, Impy 10.7 Spotting and epic guns..... sorry but your pointless thread does not carry any water... it is full of holes and is just another 'thing' to complain whinge about when there are far more serious things to worry about........... Not to you though.... everyone COULD have had a Kami ....and Impy is just soooo special that being stuck in protected T4 MM kind of ruins the ship a LOT!

So no more Kamikaze playing against T8's..... aww that's not fair ! Or Nickolai having to put up with potato tier 3/5 matches when it is so much more fun murdering T7 cruisers........ Impregnator, fires at Kuma...... overpen city..... fires at Pensacola.... citadel city! How about OP play a few more games, learn the mechanics then come back and complain from a position of knowlege.... Kamikaze, Imperator etc are MORE useful outside their tiers due to penetration /camoflage mechanics and in the hands of a decent player are more than capable of carrying a game ! How about you?

what I don't get here is... whats the issue? Don't like KM DD in current form? Don't play them..... thats what we were all told about RN CL and those of us that wanted to played the4m, those that didn't... didn't? Simples, seems here it is another case of nationalistic crying... come on KM you got the BEST BB's in the game, now you want the best DD's? Want invisi fire, run USN or Polish?

No it was 'economic'... they looked at IJN /USN at launch as they 'presumed' that they would get the most spending from NA/SEA..... then their Russian overlords demanded Stalins Specials.... then the 'mainly inactive' German (Port based) Navy followed.... as per usual in Wargamings mindset (looking at you WoT) the British had absolutely no part to play in either world wars... neither did they have a navy anywhere near as powerful or numerous as the 'mighty' [paper] USSR Navy....... To paraphrase... "Between 1921 and 1922, the world’s largest naval powers gathered in Washington, D.C. for a conference to discuss naval disarmament and ways to relieve growing tensions...." (Note Largest naval Powers) "In 1921, U.S. Secretary of State Charles Evans Hughes invited nine nations to Washington, D.C. to discuss naval reductions and the situation in the Far East. The United Kingdom, Japan, France and Italy were invited to take part in talks on reducing naval capacity, while Belgium, China, Portugal, and the Netherlands were invited to join in discussions on the situation in the Far East." (Note USSR/Germany absent... heck even Portugal got invited to comment... NOT USSR; or Germany because they had been soundly thrashed in round 1) "The Five-Power Treaty, signed by the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, France and Italy was the cornerstone......." (seeing the trend here yet? @ WG maybe you should have concentrated on NAVAL POWERS for a Naval Game?) Please to whichever idiot next talks about Modern Battleships.... have a quick Google search and you may discover that there are NO SUCH ships currently in service in ANY Major Navy worldwide........

And another 12 year old with 'opinions'...... go back to tanks bro... just go ... please !

Shiratsuyu: 16 Mahan: 21 Sims (BL Mk. 7 mod. 2B): 15 Sims (Mk 15 mod. 0): 8 Leningrad: 22 Blyskawica: 30 Myoko: 14 Flint: 22 Atlanta: 17 Shchors: 9 Fiji: 20 +1 = 21 Because she really is a better DD than most DD's stealth, outstanding AP, excellent torps, smoke hydro, heal... Ffs all it needs is radar to be the new imperator. Belfast: 29 -3 =26 no heal, no torps, need completely different captain on her oh and Fiji is solo much better! Colorado: 8 Gneisenau: 17 Scharnhorst: 32 Hiryu (2/2/2): 19 Hiryu (3/1/2) : 17 Ranger (0/1/3): 16 Saipan (Torpedo Bombers): 22 Saipan (Dive Bombers): 11

WOW ! Is Grindr TinderChief on acid? Playing CoOp is NOTHING like playing randoms........ youare being quite the mouthy soul for someone who plays against Bots constantly... come try playing with the big boys and maybe you would learn a thing or 2. ON TOPIC As has been stated many MANY times whenever someone comes on screaming about skill based MM..... eventually (using SBMM) most players would end up in the same league due to those lower in the skills league, working up due to MM and those higher working down due to MM.... Random is Random, either work with it or go play something else... just don't try to break the game which we all like to play due to a percieved elitism!

Use it for mainly keeping an eye on the Teamspeak server and browsing when dead in game lol... FYI it's an old Dell 20" de cased and hanging on double sided 'servo' tape ! Howver all is not as 'tidy' as it seems Oh and by the way if anyone is interested I have a variety of well looked after pre owned PC parts about ready for selling ;)

Course you 'can' play in superwide...... 4800x1200......... Or as I do now........

Nah not a great OC that one dude.... 9590 is easy specced for 5 to 5.2Ghtz...... http://valid.x86.fr/63618f or http://valid.x86.fr/qcstas

PC = Monitor =

BAD-Armada are a group of old farts..... mix of ex military, oil workers, teachers, bus drivers, retirees... oh and if you have an ailment it helps, seems we are all on our last legs too !

SEA server for South East Asia, NA server for North America, EU server for Europe, RU server for Russia........ it's bad enough on EU with various languages, try it with Far Eastern Alphabets, Cyrillic, Arabic etc etc..... so no, Better that EEU goes to RU, WEU stays on EU.... clean up chat etc....

What like the constant tears in game from BB when faced with 16 torps from Neptune every 85 seconds ........

Yep another [edited] import from WoT arty who thinks its perfectly fine to drop a shell on enemy tanky that is being facehugged by a friendly......... ! [edited]

Hey all, just a question, more for the devs than anyone else but if you have the answer then please give it.... Royal Navy CL have [magic] AP only, now..... Firstly..... when you look at the flags x 2 for increased fire chance, they each give a +0.5% chance of fire... assuming that you use them both does this then give RN AP a 1% CoF..... Secondly.... the demolition expert skill also gives a +3% CoF but neither the flags, nor the skill stipulate that it is ONLY for HE shells, just a calibre size.... My question is thus, if all things are as I expect then will these three items [magically] give RN [Magic] Ap a 4% Chance of setting a fire.....? Answers on a postcard please ;)

Only thought was that the descriptions are very specific in that they state calibre but NOT shell type... anyway tried it in 2 games in Leander and no fires so far........ well except secondaries of course... The main reason for this was with my imminent move to Minotaur there will need to be a general re speccing of skills due to lack of secondaries, too fast RoF and epic turret rotation... so just wondered about T4 skill and whether it would work as such... but seems not will try a few more games in Leander to double triple check but seems the consensus is right !

Ahhh well tried it and as Gunship suggested.... nope it no worky.... was worth a go but nope... anyway it ends my wondering ! Mods close please as I have found my answer !

thats not really an answer, has anyone ever tried it out at all?

It is assuming you have a sense of humour and enjoy banter in general matey !

To be honest Tuccy, there is little need to add this may more, being as there are over 30 'clans' with one person in them....... maybe people didn't get the memo that clans are about groups NOT tags....... ?

25 out of the 30 have been picked, any BAD A guys who are still out there come on TS and be interviewed.

Actually it is pretty annoying and a bit sad if clans have to spam recruitment posts in game to gain members.... FFS there are only 30 spots per group.... and with such limited numbers for BETA it is actually a little bit insulting to those larger clans who missed the cutoff and have been left out due to singletons wanting a clan tag and only now panicking about getting their numbers up... So yes +1 to the OP and hopefully the endless spam in game will stop soon.

Hey guys, so the clan system BETA is here and looks, so far, very pretty and fairly user friendly.... with a few 'exceptions'.... Now several issues have come up which I hope that WG staff may be able to help with and I have listed tham as follows:- 1) Having to switch out to WoWs Web Portal to do invites where a simple right click on player in game would seem to suffice. 2) Players with 'hidden' stats are searchable, but you are unable to invite them unless they send you the link to their stats. 3) The pop up in game seems to hang for ages, having to be closed manually. 4) I personally have sent out invites to current members of our clan inviting them to join the 30.... they have clicked yes but they have not updated, pop up has gone but they show up on invite list as invite pending, when you attempt to resend the invite system states that this player does not meet criteria. (bug?) Hope that as this is BETA then there may be a workaround for some of these issues and I would be happy to discuss it further.