-
Content Сount
419 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
1295
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Ph3lan
-
The winners are : Top 3 – 11 citadels 1. Elendor - 218 349 damage = 2500 doubloons 2. Triodar - 199 146 damage = 1500 doubloons 3. Nalopleon7 - 198 631 damage = 1000 doubloons 10 citadels 4. Arkhannan = 500 doubloons 5. sreddy = 500 doubloons 6. Sharana = 500 doubloons 7. Cosmonautilus = 500 doubloons 9 citadels 8. Crazy_O = 500 doubloons 9. Headless = 500 doubloons 10. sahome = 500 doubloons 11. Zetachi = 500 doubloons 12. Kreol1q1q = 500 doubloons 13. Nikonosz = 500 doubloons 14. anhu = 500 doubloons 15. frontline = 500 doubloons Congratulations guys! In our second forum contest you are required to play any battleship of Tier V or higher. The aim is to score as many of those devastating citadel hits as possible. A replay is not required, but if you have a particularly epic battle, we would love to see it. Instructions on how to enable a replay can be found here: http://forum.worldof...ld-of-warships/ The rules: The winner is the player with the most citadel hits scored in a single battle You must play a battleship of Tier V or higher The battle has to have taken place between the 23/9/2015 and the 30/9/2015 (23:59) Submissions have to be made before the 1st of October Only random battles are allowed You have to have no damage caused to allies You can enter as many times as you like. Simply make a new reply to the thread with a new result, however only your best submission is counted. You need to provide a full screenshot of the first page of the battle results, as well as the damage caused detailed report In case of a tie, the player with the highest amount of damage will win All non-related posts will be deleted The winners will be announced in this forum thread on 6th of October. This contest is only open to players with an EU account Prizes: 1st place: 2500 doubloons 2nd place: 1500 doubloons 3rd place: 1000 doubloons 4th – 15th place: 500 doubloons Good luck! Sample submissions:
- 169 replies
-
- 15
-
-
The first two were our first competitions in the WoWS forum. Both finished very recently with lots of submissions and as I said we are going to have similar events in the near future. The third one is indeed a player-run competition, however it is partly sponsored by WGEU (the doubloons come from us). To be honest, MrFingers reading your various posts and threads, I kinda get the feeling that you are on a personal vendetta against WGEU. You are trying your hardest to ignore everything we do right and point out everything (you feel) we do wrong. Maybe try doing something constructive instead, like Ducat1st0 did with his contest
-
Meanwhile in Europe we also have these, and we are going to have more in the future: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/31528-bullseye/ http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/31404-deadliest-catch/ http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/32123-competition-win-a-tacobanana/
-
Hey guys! The winners are: Top 3 – 11 citadels 1. Elendor - 218 349 damage = 2500 doubloons 2. Triodar - 199 146 damage = 1500 doubloons 3. Nalopleon7 - 198 631 damage = 1000 doubloons 10 citadels 4. Arkhannan = 500 doubloons 5. sreddy = 500 doubloons 6. Sharana = 500 doubloons 7. Cosmonautilus = 500 doubloons 9 citadels 8. Crazy_O = 500 doubloons 9. Headless = 500 doubloons 10. sahome = 500 doubloons 11. Zetachi = 500 doubloons 12. Kreol1q1q = 500 doubloons 13. Nikonosz = 500 doubloons 14. anhu = 500 doubloons 15. frontline = 500 doubloons Since I am not in the office this week you can expect the prizes to be credited on your accounts early next week! Sorry about that, I'll try to get it done as soon as I get back! It was awesome going through all these great matches! Congratulations to all of you! - Ph3lan
-
Don't worry, we are going to have more specials for you in October
-
Please put in a mute function for these quick messages
Ph3lan replied to Dirpitz's topic in General Discussion
We have passed on the feedback, the developers are aware of the issue. -
In my experience RNG hates WG employees. Since I arrived at the office, my stats went down the drain (Probably due to the unfamiliar PC I am using, but that might be just me looking for excuses)
-
The fact that "Can we please buff Battleships?" and "Cruisers are outrageously unbalanced" are to of the most hotly debated topics ATM is probably a good indication that these two classes are actually in a pretty good spot as far as balance is concerned at least when it comes to fighting against each other. When I sit in my Pensacola and see a battleship my thought process is: I am going to wiggle my ship as unpredictable as I can (preferably timing his salvos if he is firing full broadsides) and burn him down, he has no chance. When I sit in my North Carolina and see a cruiser: I am going to predict where he is turning and citadel him with my first salvo then sink him with my second, he has no chance. No matter if I sit in a CA or in a BB I always feel that if I am playing correctly and Fortuna is just a little bit on my side I can have the upper hand.
-
Don't worry, bumping into someone won't exclude you from the contest.
-
Well, on the one hand you can evade quite a few torps if you have good map awareness and keep track of where the bombers are coming from (plus staying in cruiser cover when possible can help too), on the other hand you are not supposed to dodge every single torpedo. You are a battleship with a few hit points to spare plus you can recover quite a bit of the flooding (and fire) damage over time. With good map awareness, positioning, intelligent consumable usage and precise shooting BBs can be extremely strong.
-
Hey TomTheBonehead! The screenshot you provided doesn't tell much about what happened in the battle, however the fact that you survived and received only 125 XP (even if it was a defeat) tells me that you didn't contribute much to the battle (you did very little damage, didn't shoot down planes etc. ) Credits and XP are rewards for battle performance, which means that if you don't contribute you get very little of both and while you can kinda get away with that in lower tiers without losing money, at tier 8 you need to "work for your money". - Ph3lan
-
Premium shop ships - no benefit (same error like in WoWP)
Ph3lan replied to ulthien's topic in General Discussion
It seems that we have very different experiences when it comes to premium ships/tanks. Premium vehicles have always been great credit earners in Wargaming titles (that's one of the main reasons you buy them) and this hasn't changed either in WoT or in WoWS, they clearly earn more than their regular counterparts. To illustrate my point I've attached two results with the Tirpitz. The first result is my latest game with the ship, nothing special, just a decent game. Still, it earned me more than half a million credits. The second picture shows a battle of my colleague MrConway, an outstanding battle with more than 1.000.000 credits earned. But even way worse matches earn me 200-300k credits. I doubt any regular Tier 8 could match that income. -
Greetings Captains! We are interested in your opinions about Flag packages in the premium shop. If you have any additional feedback, don't hesitate to share it in the comments.
-
Greetings Captains! Please leave any your feedback about the changes to matchmaking in Update 0.4.1 in this thread. To help us gather feedback accurately and identify any issues, keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible. Irrelevant/off-topic entries will be deleted and the comment disregarded.
-
Hello Captains! I am Ph3lan, the new ( well, let's say "newish" ) Community Coordinator for the English Team. You might have already seen me posting on the WoWS forums in the last couple of weeks, but silly as I am, I have completely forgotten to introduce myself. So here it is:I come from Hungary and before becoming a Coordinator I have been a Hungarian Community Contributor (youtuber/streamer) who has been playing World of Tanks, World and Warships and other Wargaming titles for a really long time. I am looking forward to working with the English Language Community and hopefully I am going to see you guys on the forums, social media, in-game as well as at offline events. Don’t hesitate to say hi if you see me!
-
Greetings Captains! Please leave your feedback about the changes to the Japanese Navy in Update 0.4.1 in this thread. To help us gather feedback accurately and identify any issues, keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible. Irrelevant/off-topic entries will be deleted and the comment disregarded
-
Where are the WG employees, community managers,...? Ectar? Tuccy? Ph3lan?
Ph3lan replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
I understand where you are coming from. However it is not only about being busy, it is also about posting something that is relevant and answering questions we can answer. Being active on the forums and working on community events is also only a part of our responsibilities, we have lots of other stuff to work on that's less visible than our forum presence. That being said, our team is getting bigger, so you should see us posting more in the future -
Where are the WG employees, community managers,...? Ectar? Tuccy? Ph3lan?
Ph3lan replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
The discussion of news articles moved to the portal, that's why no new news articles have been added to the "News and Announcements" section. Pretty much, this. -
I have played both in the last couple of days quite a bit. I have to say that I like the Tirpitz more, and I generally do better in it, but that might be just my love for BBs talking It probably comes down to your own personal preference. If you do better in CAs you should probably go for the Atago, if you prefer BBs you won't be disappointed with the Tirpitz.
-
Yeah, it probably wouldn't work with a stock configuration. Then again, the NC has a the advantage that 2/3 of its damage is concentrated in the 2 front turrets which is quite advantageous if you want to shot something in front of you. So in a head on fight its in a pretty good position even without the rear turret and presenting a broadside to the enemy.
-
US Battleships line gets worse around New Mexico
Ph3lan replied to pootle42's topic in Newcomers' Section
I have to agree with the guys above, the New Mexico is one of the best ships of the American BB line. I am currently at the North Carolina, but I still wish I would sail the NM instead. Fully equipped it turns exceptionally well for a BB and has awesome guns for its tier. The only thing I didn't like about it , was its speed but you can't have everything right? I would give it another chance if I were you, it may grow on you! -
Try to angle your ship and present the smallest possible target to the enemy. It can be a bit tricky since the turret in the back has a very limited firing arc when it is facing forward, but if you time it correctly you can shoot your salvo and be angled again by the time the enemy is about to shoot.In my experience the NC is a great cruiser killer, the Cleveland is a special case though. The easiest way to citadel a Clevelend is to shoot it slightly forward of the frontal gun turrets (so not in the middle of the ship like with other cruisers). Good luck!
-
Greetings Captains! Please leave any general feedback regarding the 0.4.1 public test in this thread. To help us gather feedback accurately and identify any issues, keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible. Irrelevant/off-topic entries will be deleted and the comment disregarded.
-
Greetings Captains! Please leave any feedback regarding the new maps Straits and Solomon Islands and existing map changes in 0.4.1 in this thread. To help us gather feedback accurately and identify any issues, keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible. Irrelevant/off-topic entries will be deleted and the comment disregarded.
-
Greetings Captains! Please leave any feedback regarding the various smaller changes and updates in the 0.4.1 update in this thread. We're looking for feedback specifically regarding the following categories: Reporting system User Interface Visual effects Sound effects To help us gather feedback accurately and identify any issues, keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible. Irrelevant/off-topic entries will be deleted and the comment disregarded.
