Keulz

Somehow, i doubt we'll be heard. WoT still does'nt scale anything.

Yes, and i don't have any problem with players that are ready to get out of the cap if no one took the bait. You're joking, right ? Have you really checked my screenshot ?

Ben dis-donc, ça fait plaisir de voir des nouveaux avec de la cervelle. (Bon, juste un truc, il n'y a jamais eu de "aimbot" et "l'aim mod" auquel tu dois faire référence a été rendu inopérant depuis la 0.3.1, donc à priori, plus de [edited]erie du genre. Mais arrête, c'est bien plus délicat qu'en BB. Déjà c'est de la psychologie, tu dois essayer de prédire les choix que va faire ton ennemi. Tu peux ne pas le faire, mais dans ce cas là tu n'exploites pas totalement ton DD. Comme tu peux sniper en fond de map avec ton BB et tu le gâcheras.

You too, less than 10 games with CV... Let's sum it up : when someone complains that DD torps are OP, that really often means that they never play DD when someone complains that CV are OP and easy to play, that really often means that the never play CV I kinda see a pattern there. One that tells me that people are narrow minded and not necessarily try to see the big picture but are, like in the game, only tunnelvisionning on 'i'm playing fine, so if i die too much it's because of the balance, not me' and never want to see the other side of the picture. You know what ? I kinda agree with you. It's cheap from me, i should be explaining why i know that you argument is invalid then tell you why i think that beyond being invalid, i think it's wrong. But you're like the creeps, you explain to one, 10 more come out with the same prejudices. And that when the first understand, because usually they tend to be stubborn. So yeah, that may be low. But that doesn't mean it's not true though. You see, that's the whole issue here. You feel powerless => you come on the forum saying CVs are OP instead of asking some help. Why wouldn't it be your fault if you die ? You never make any mistake ? You really think you already figured out everything in the game ? When i take a full volley from TB, i always immediately think 'what an idiot, i stopped looking at the minimap, i should have seen them coming and start evading'. And thanks to that, i'm improving. Now, about the fact that i think having so little to no experience on CV should prevent you from doing statements like you did is not as straight forward as you think, it's not to prevent people that don't like the CV gameplay to post, it's for 2 reasons : as i already said, you don't know how to play them, so you can't know if it's easy or not to manually shoot TB. Play them, for real, you'll realize how tricky that can be you don't play CV so you don't really know what is really irritating when you're a CV player. A played a fair part of CV, and i've wasted quite a lot torps, so i know how to avoid them. And that's the real reason, if you know a class, you know it's flaws, so you'll know how to exploit them when facing CVs or DDs. Back in alpha, in my beginnings, i was at something like 0.5 kill/game and i never came on the forum to complain about it, i learn from my many mistakes (some i still do) and i improved myself. So stop complainning and start learning. Please ?

Yeah, it's called 'basic statistics'.

I don't need anything more to know that you don't know what you're talking about. So, either you don't have sufficient experience to say it's OP or not and then, you should just shut up and try. Either you do have enough experience and your pathetic results are the demonstration that no, CV aren't OP like you say. So, which is it ? To be fair, since it's really hard to master (unlike you say) i'm not suprise that for a beginner you only landed 1 or 2 torps in 2 games, i think it's just that you got wrecked some times and your mad.

There are islands litterally everywhere on this map, and the mahans went in the cap from the beginning. Of course it can be usefull to cap to force the ennemies to rush to reset, but when i do that i'm ready to get out of the cap if no one comes committing suicide on me.

Well, as you know, ship happens... And an amagi popping at <10km and landing 3 citadells is still possible. Well, that doesn't happen often to me, maybe i got OS only once, but you never know. That must be a bug since i wrecked a montana with my gearing and HE (and it was the day before yesterday)

Let's be honest, those who are stupid enough to camp at the borders aren't the ones that are coming back to reset the cap... And a cap system is absolutely necessary to counter the cowards that just flee to get the draw. As a matter of facts, i don't recall ever being mad at losing early by cap. When that happens, i blame myself (or the team mates) for not defending properly. But it's horrible when you have 3 kills, there are still 5+ ennemies, right in your torps range and suddenly, the match ends because a dd capped after having done no damage. After a long experience in wot i can assure you one thing, it's rarely that the ones that are early capping are in the upper half, XP-wise. Those who cap when there are still plenty people to kill are mostly people who did nothing during the game. (not always, obviously) i don't know about wows since we can't know who capped in the results. Anyway, please, someone tells me that a game like that is fun : One (or two) guys, sitting in their smoke, not moving at all, when more of 2/3 are still alive...

Well, it's a war game, we play the game not to win but to have fun. Shooting at other people is fun. Pressing W then S to stop in a gigantic circle isn't fun. I'm sorry but i don't see the point in playing if it's to have a win with only 2-3 kills... The way i see it, they should add something to make the cap slower when there is still a lot of players and a lot of time and to accelerate the cap when the time is running low and there isn't much people left. TL;DR: capping is fine, but not before you had the opportunity to actually play.

Comme l'a dit mad, si ton moteur est HS, tu continues juste sur ta lancée jusqu'à t'arrêter. Non, ce ne sont pas des aides à la visée.

Mon dieu, c'est n'importe quoi. Déjà, le calcul, même s'il est à peu près juste mathématiquement, n'a aucune pertinence. Mais aucune. Et puis si tires au 203mm à la HE sur l'aoba, c'est que tu n'as pas compris l'intérêt d'avoir du 203 au lieu de 152mm. Perso, je fais autant de dégâts par partie avec le cleveland que l'aoba, mais peut-être que je ne suis pas aussi bon joueur que toi et que du coup je n'ai pas ta capacité d'analyse. PS : Le cleveland va passer tier VII quand il y aura split des croiseurs US, tout le monde sait qu'il est un peu OP, mais ils ne sont pas pressés, ce n'est que la beta.

Non mais d'accord, c'est pas accessible à un gamin de 5 ans, mais c'est quand même laaaargement plus facile que de faire de l'attaque efficace avec des TB, hein. Sans compter que dans les premiers tiers, tu as tellement peu d'avions que c'est pas grave si tu les butes après qu'ils aient largué leurs torpilles, en moins de 5 minutes il sera à sec d'avions et il aura fait deux passages de torpilles. Franchement, oui ça a une utilité certaine de faire de la suprématie aérienne, mais faudrait qu'ils enlèvent ces loadout, il n'y a pas assez de CV dans chaque équipe pour que ça soit intéressant. Quand tu es en configuration d'attaque et que tu tombes face à un chasseur, ben tu peux quitter, ta partie est foutue et celle du CV d'en face aussi, vu que son seul but est de te pourrir toi et toi seulement, partout, tout le temps et de manière écrasante.

Pretty good idea there !!!

Nonon, there will be unified account. Just not right know, they're not even sure it will be at the release. So until then, you'll pay double if you play wot with premium.

Pour le patchnbote de demain, ils changent des rayon de brakage et visiblement nerfent ceux des BB/CV, une bonne chose.

Because :

Sorry but WG IS becoming greedy, that is a fact. I've done the cbt of wot and alpha of wowp and this is what changed : paying access to cbt (yes, you can get selected too, but don't tell me they give as many key as in wot...) the fact that during obt, if you play wot/wowp with premium and want to do the same on wowp, you'll have to pay 2 premium account simultaneously. And for no valid reason since the account unification already was tested with wowp and worked well. You add to that that half the gift tank on wot for the next campaign, instead of 11k gift will become something like 5k gift and 6k privilege to pay gold for it, when they always were giving out 10-11k for free. All in all, there goels certainly shifted from before and it's sad.

OMG, i'm lacking the ban-free words to describe you... you're only beta teste so that means that you only saw 1 patch implated so how could you know it's worse each patch since you only saw one ? 500 battles on a game in a 'horrible state' ? Are you a masochist ? And yes, alpha and weekend testers are critizing it but : their is absolutely no game ever, and there will never be one, that wouldn't be criticized by no one (that works for any movie, music, book, car, antything) Seriously, that is a challenge not to call you what you really are, so i'll stop right here. But one thing reeally makes me sad, it's that you certainly have the right to vote. And that creeps me out.

So he outsmarted you.

In 3 weeks.

I must confess something... When i'm confronted to someone that is : having a hard time against torps/TB only assuming the game/dev team is at fault (like here) I prefer to ignore them because : why bothering with someone so full of himself, wasting a lot of time to try to make him understand well... Let's say it, i always enjoy facing brain damaged BB that sail strait and eat my torps 1 minute after i sent them... I'm not proud of it, and i've the utmost respect for committed peoples like shepbur and the likes who spend so much time trying to enlight mor not that smart peoples. But seriously, why bother with peoples so closed minded ?

Then you don't have enough experience.

Ah, merci du conseil, je n'avais pas vu.

Nope, they said it's because it was bugged with the new ships, so they removed it for the time being. Let's said he OS him. One-salvoed.