Lieut_Gruber

Wow 10 pages already.....all the drama queens are present as usual, using big fat capitals Anyone remember the RPF captain skill (or RL)? Same people screaming this would kill DD play......well it didnt. Maybe just wait and see how it works in game first?

Then she must be balanced

Well the new ships need to be stronger so we spend money to get them.

The answer seems obvious to me: most new lines are stronger than the old ones. After a while WG tunes them down to normal levels. And sometimes, they need a 2nd life buff to be able to compete again with newer ships. Its a fluid process, the game changes all the time, ships need changes also.

A critical hit on his ego

Afaik Kuznetsov's abilities dont work in clan battles.

It is always the same usual suspects who derail topics to cv rework ranting, maybe an idea to punish those instead of closing the whole topic?

Agreed. Im not a bad shot, but i often dont bother firing on Henry IV's until i am out of easier targets. Unless im in a ship with rail guns like Moskva or Stalingrad, then that annoying is going down

Before the rework, i, and many others, checked the stats of both CV players at the start of a match. If there was a big difference in winrate, you could tell the outcome of that match 99% sure. I dont do that anymore since the rework, so for me it feels the rework was an improvement.

Yes that is exactly what i meant yes.... I agree with you that feedback is important, but all that "i dont like cv because i cant shoot back at them yada yada" is not feedback. Listening to players like those is bad, because all they want is shape the game to their likes. You cant give most people what they want, because often people are selfish and greedy and dont care for good gameplay.

Well i got bad news for you, you arent going to get your RTS CV play back (i know you will say you dont want that, but i think you lie about it). This is also the last words i will spend on you, since arguing with you is like talking to a concrete wall, pointless.

A forum is a place to discuss things, so people talk with each other about stuff. A game is something you play, it is as it is, and how WG decides. You can change opinions on a forum, not a game.

Its a free game, no one forces you to play it. Dont like it, go play something else.

You dont have to 'counterplay' everything in this game, Just accept as it is.

This is not a real problem, just something between the ears of many players.

I can, those guys think:"i need a bigger ship. Hmmm, where can i get a bigger ship easily...."

Isnt T2 protected?

I stand confused every time is see this behaviour in the game. You choose to play a WARgame, get a big bad ship with mean weapons, just to sail to the furthest island to hide. I guess its just human nature, hide with the herd until the lions have killed the weakest member so we are safe for a while.

You can also citadel on the barbettes under the gunturrets, but i agree the Stalin will be easier to cit. That will be the advantage for PR i guess.

It realy does not matter if the product is worth the price. I find Ferrari's not worth their price, maybe a better example is IPhone. The iPhone is build for like $160,-(?), and people buy it for €1100,-. Maybe we should see the PR as a status symbol, bought by people who can affort it.

I have both ships, i find the Puerto Rico the better ship.

Arent you turning a mosquito into an elephant here? After all, all WG did do was giving everyone a T7 ship for reasonable effort, and a T10 for extra cash. Are you also going to scream at people who drive Ferrari's because they are really expensive and we cant buy those because rich people are willing to spend 300k on them? Only thing they could have done better was show more clear how much you needed to spend at forehand.

Just did my first battle in PR, and i like her! I did t get shot much, but it feels like a smaller, faster Montana. The Monty is known as a cruiser killer, but i think PR will be better at it, since the Monty broadside is a bit overkill on a cruiser. I went open water, and using the rear turrets doesnt need that much broadside to be given. I noticed she has 27mm deck armour on the nose, and 38mm midship, pretty dedent imo. AA is almost Wooster values, only long range from Wooster is better. If you have to compare her, i believe the only fair candidates will be the Stalingrad or Yoshino. Does anyone know if PR also gets the superheavy US shells?

When the Tirpitz was sold people got the same crap for playing Tirpitz. I always replied "thanks to these people spending money on the game, you play for free, you should thank them". I do agree that WG should have been more transparent about how hard it would be to get the PR without premium boosters. I also fell for that, had to buy 3rd booster to be able to get it, or end up empty handed with 2 booster spend.

At 17km the dispersion is almost at Max, so you can pray to the rng gods for not sending one in your citadel. And if i remember correct, before the rework, if a CV wanted you dead, you were dead in 1 full strike. Didn't matter if BB, CA OR DD. Memories run short here ...