ScarecrowCZ

Let's be honest here - if you think French/Italian BB dispersion with 1.6 sigma is more accurate than USN dispersion with 1.5 sigma, you shouldn't be listened to in the first place. Even the best players would struggle to notice 0.1 sigma difference on ships with the same dispersion (compare patterns of Kii (1.7), Amagi (1.8), Ignis/Ragnarok (1.9) and Nagato (2.0) - you will prolly safely identify the outlines, but 0.1 steps will be guesswork). And let's not forget the first test iteration of Giulio Cesare was broken with 1.5 sigma. As for buying the crap ships - Playerbase decried Hood to be utter trash tier (lost about 50 karma for daring to play her - and ranking out - in t7 ranked) yet it pretty much completely counters things like Sinop. Playerbase decried Agir to be utter trash tier - yet it performs decently. Playerbase decried Alsace to be trash tier because "lol, no overmatch, bad dispersion" - cue her running rampant until the nerf and it is still valid pick. Playerbase decried Odin to be trash tier - yet it performs decently both in ranked and in randoms. See the pattern there? Yes?

We all know how Alsace performed with 1.7, we all know Bourg is T10 material with 1.9 and you sure do remember how broken Giulio Cesare was with cruiser dispersion and 1.5 sigma. But sure, tell us how WG handled Mainz, T61 and Odin. As for you selling premium - that's your problem. I played both FDG and Alsace both pre and post buffs and I would kill for FDG hull with 12 bisco guns. And let's be real here - if Alsace overperformed with 1.7 and had to have both reload and sigma nerfed with *worse dispersion pattern*, Pommern would outright powercreep it with its sturdy hull.

I mean it has better dispersion and durability than Alsace, which is already helluva strong in tier 9. But yeah, better to promote power creep and cry about a meaningless parameter.

The only armour removed was the fore/aft end belt and 21mm worth of deck. O-class had no "frontal citadel protection" you claim it had - athwartship got buffed even. So take your "front citadel plate" and (without any sort of respect, I would normally show to a human being) shove it to the place where you store your imaginary friends. Ad second paragraph of something I would loathe to call post - Ships within time period game encompasses were always classified by the caliber of armament and tonnage (depending on a treaty in effect) and that goes even retroactively. Ad the last paragraph - WG removed fore/aft end belts which had not existed and 21mm worth of deck - surely you have a blueprint of O-class which has "front citadel plate" you claim it was meant to have and you can share it. As for our "butting of heads" - your last battle was in February this year ergo we couldn't have argued "last week" (having to make crap like this up is plain pathetic). Also, since you seem to have need to fabricate this, I highly doubt you have any sort of real-life you seem to love preaching about.

Awthawtship is improved as well - straight 110mm over 80-110-80 O-Class should have. Besides the only "controversy" with missing armor was the extended belt taken from wrong blueprints.

ad the first paragraph: Get your terminology straight - your "front citadel plate" is called "fore/aft armoured belt" or "extended armoured belt" or "belt extension"- you know, the bit protecting the pointy end from bow/stern penetrations. O-Class lacked this "bit" in its final configuration and it was not being seriously considered since April 1939. So yes, the fore/aft 60mm armoured belt was removed - not by WG but by Kriegsmarine itself - in the late design stage. ad the second paragraph - Neither of those is light cruiser by WNT because as even you might notice - 180mm is more than 155mm. ad the third paragraph - Almost as if reviewing of WIP ships gave the completely wrong idea of the final version of the ship. As for the last one - I'm not even sure we met. EDIT: You should really learn how to quote posts.

Driver používám na notebooku už od doby kdy byl 451.22 beta a na i7 7700HQ + 1070m funguje WoWS bez problémů.

You confuse vocal minority with majority

Ah yes... another boycott - will it end up like the PR one? Borderlands 3 one? Or like the Modern Warfare 2 one?

Pomoci s negramotností? To bych mohl, ale už něco mám

Amazing - every single word in this verbal vomit is plain wrong. How do you even achieve this level of misinformation? 1) Breyers armour layout of final O-Project (1939 final design) shows no extended armour belts. Speaking of which - if you really want "historical armour" we should nerf Agir and Siegfried turrets to about 210mm. Those somehow escaped your "missing armor" rant. 2) No matter how much you [edited] about it, Nevsky isn't worst offender when it comes to pushing CL boundaries - that honour goes to light cruiser Pensacola (yes, she was ordered as a light cruiser with 10 203mm guns) and Cleveland with its 14k tons displacement in 1940. 3) Do yourself a favour and learn something about french naval doctrine. Apart from Richelieu-class, every ship had poor vertical but good horizontal protection of machinery spaces - which is - to nobody surprise - repeated at Champagne. 4) If the KGB-censure is a nod to Flologate - perhaps he might consider stopping being drama queen. It's not exactly normal procedure to make a post on twitter so his fans might rage and get in touch with mods of subreddit about his shadow ban TWO HOURS after the twitter post. If it´s a nod to iEG "letter" - that thing was proven factually incorrect and you really should refrain from reading disgruntled former employee trash talk.

Takoví co umí číst? No takoví jsou rozhodně potřebnější než ty.

First - range nerf was reverted Second - Starting with top 10%, alaska outperforms it. And while guns are accurate for battleship, they are inaccurate for supercruiser, let alone a cruiser.

That one was more about main battery reliability, thought it was obvious.

If "nerfing" means "making ship actually competitive" to you :D Secondary cruiser is a flawed concept unless you will make the ship tankier than same tier BBs (read batshit broken). If it sacrifices the main battery for good secondaries, you will get another FdG or Kronshtadt-esque shotgun without ballistics to make up for it. If it sacrifices mobility, why even bother? Odin is quite strong if played properly - now I don't own her and I make my observations based on gameplay and being on receiving side of her main battery. IMO she is very comparable to Vanguard in being supercruiser taking a BB slot. It's relatively agile and stealthy with decent enough accuracy (USN BB dispersion with 2.0 sigma - think vertically prolonged Scharnhorst dispersion ellipse, due to better ballistics of her main battery). Play her like CA for the first 8 to 10 minutes of the match and only then switch to BB role and start brawling weakened enemies. Also - my WR and damage in Siegfried are about the same as T9.5 Alaska (read the single most OPd ship in tier 9) ergo I would move both Siegfried and Mainz to OPd category without a second thought.