Kazomir

Do you not think Notser/Flamu have not done videos on the current game meta and don't complain about it in almost every video? Cause they have. And if this continues they will, again.

One post takes you a few second. One game, 10-15 minutes. It is not that strange.

Our comments changed the Graf Zeppelin situation. Our comments and feedback are the reason RN BBs dont have radar on top of all this madness. Comment enough, and you make someone higher up there take a note. Do not underestimate the power of a voice loud enough.

That is true, but I feel I would like to add a point of my own here. New features are nice, And I am all for adding new features. But the MAIN POINT I posted in the OP is that there has been so many new features included, that the fundamentals of this game are now screwed up. So, before adding any new stuff, you'd have to fix the old stuff first. Or your building collapses. It's like trying to add a new floor to a building which has issues with the foundation in a region that is plagued by earthquakes.

Their squishyness was balanced by their awesome hea and underwater citadelsl. (that said, Lion and Monarch actually have pretty awesome armor to be honest) Giving them the best BB concealment in the game is a gimmick too much and is wading deep into cruiser-specialty territory. Heck Conqueror can ambush some of the Tier X cruisers with ease, and Monarch can ambush lower tier cruisers because they cannot mount the Concealment Modification slot. Put HE on top of that, then the special skill-less AP as well (Aim at superstructure do consistent 12k salvos, who needs citadels), and dont ignore the fact that WG was about to place Panic AA/Radar (which was removed thank god, but only because the huge turdstorm it caused) and you should get a clear Idea where is WG at with Balance. I dont trust them. Dont give me this crap. WoWs is one of the most profitable games there is, sure it's no WoT, but sales charts show it. I buy Premium ships, bundles, boxes, i've sunk at least 250 euros on this game (If not way more) which is way more than a Triple A Product, yet with this haphazard development of the game WG makes me NOT want to do it. A lot of people are on my opinion. And I don't believe a gimmicky development is a good substitute for a balanced, not too way out of the ordinary development. Even WG are starting to realize this, yet they need further prodding to show them this is not what we want. A balanced and fun to play game will keep whales like me spending and will attract new players. A gimmicky turdfest will bring new players, but alienate old ones, and the new players will soon leave as well. Heck, if WG released British Battleships which have NO gimmicks to speak of, just a normal ordinary line with just a twist or two (like only a really good heal, and probs concealment but not to this extent, discard the "Special" AP and HE) , they STILL would have been played.

Class A Baiting Phantasm. Probably A+. Guaranteed to destroy threads.

Good point. New maps would be splendid if they did not sometimes look the same in design. This is also a fundamental part of the game often overlooked. Also, a close ranged high tier map with cover. Please.

Well It was a one-trick pony that lacked anything else. I say bring it back despite my earlier rant about gimmicks. At least this one is a balanced gimmick. Give it torpedo relaod booster as well maybe?

The OG gimmick ship. Ironically removed from the game.

Myoko currently is a floating Citadel whose max range is BB comfort range and has no concealment to survive. There must be a mod to change Zao name to Senjo, but official change is what we aim for.

Most important suggestion.

You are being too specific, almost as if pulling straws. In most situations you'd prefer Belfast. Guarantee.

Poor argument. The same Argument EA and DICE brought up in Battlefield Heroes once they put guns for real money that had more ammo and crit chance than normal guns and no drawbacks, inspiring a huge EA FAILED campaign. ...the good old days...

So, say I agree, it is not objectively better, it is just better. Satisfied?

I dont think it is useless. Later-tier PANDDs are basically USN DD Gunboats, the tier 10 has better concealment than Gearing as well, so you have a pretty suffucient anti-DD capability. (Stats still not final though) You basically get torps that have more chance to strike cruisers and BBs but sacrifice the chance to strike a DD with them. (But then, you have guns for this) The only bad side is you cant torp a DD kemping bush in smoke. (but then again, smart DDs dont do this)

Not at everything, no. Just at average damage and winning. A non-premium ship can be better with 0.5 seconds rudder shift and 1 knot speed advantage over a premium, but when that premium is better at the important stuff required for you to play better and win, i'd say the premium is objectively better.

Because I dont like political-correctness or this forum's variant on it. Something is either P2W or it is not. As I mentioned, no middle ground. Black or White, thats it. P2W does not mean "I paid, I get to win 100% of the time" P2W means "I paid, therefore I get the advantage" Pay4Advantages is the same as P2W, and there is no need to re-brand it.

Good points all across. To be honest, did not mean for Rock Paper Scissors to sound like each class directly countering and being countered by an other. Rather each ship should have something it is good and and something it is bad at. Ships with no weaknesses are not good for balance.

I have to agree with the Penguin. You are trying to polish a turd here. Pay 2 Win - This means that a product (Ship tank, plane, etc) that can be bought ONLY with money or paid currency, is objectively better than it's contemporaries. It does not matter HOW MUCH better. Even slightly better is enough and can be labeled P2W. This is the definition of P2W, and there is no middle ground there. Your game is either P2W or Balanced, and man, some ships in this game are definitely P2W.

This works in the short term. In the long term, keeping players in and stuff, requires good balancing. With the RN BBs I think they have peaked in terms of Gimmickness, so it is time to look back and fix the mess to keep players in.

The only gimmick is the AP normalization, which is countered by rainbow arcs and is historical, due to Superheavy shells. AA is not a gimmick as they just have guns hun, which is also historical, and I dont know how 27mm plating helps anyone. They added the Radar gimmick to counter the RU radar gimmick, as it would have been funny if only RU cruisers had it.

WoW equipment system has been the same since Vanilla. Character progression system has been improved, yet it is still the same. WoW constantly improves and adds on new stuff. WoWs? It appears Lesta/WG Don't know what to do and just mess up the balance all the time.

Pay2win means paid content will give you advantages non-paying users dont have. If a prem ship has advantages over its silver equivalent, its Pay2Win. Examples are Atago Heal and Belfast radar. Pay4advantages is literally pay2win by definition.

Satiric post. It seems that this game has reverted to a beta stage since WG changes so much stuff. Actually scratch this. Beta was more stable in terms of changes.

Yes, nerf fire in this BB heavy meta because BB HE spam too stronk. Bloody hilarious.