Kazomir

I think the Gremiashiy is more like a Type 59. Being a combination of both destroyer worlds, a good torpedo and gunboat at tier 5.

Those are not really the Aoba turrets and Torpedo mounts though. Also superstructure and funnels are different.

THREE new forum posters with sub-50% winrates posting that BBs are UP. Something is going on.... Anywho, welcome to the forums an all that, please refrain from posting anything excessively dumb and go right up to the guide sections to learn some crap about the game, cause Sure as hell it aint me who is gonna educate you 4'o clock in the damn morning. PS: Older forum posters, be more polite, even when dealing with dumb posts.

BaBy whiners at work again I see. It's not like any other ship is immune to fires, only BBs get them. Honest. I advise you to please educate yourself about the game before posting exaggerated crap on the forums.

I'm gonna flip a table and crap a brick right on top of it.

Not attempting to slam Flamu or anything, he is a very good player, but most of his videos are like that. His Molotov comentary I saw today aswell had cruisers constantly sailing broadside to him and BBs that did not even target him. (He was also top-tier) Videos like that make the ships seem OP as heck, actually made me think that the molotov is hugely imbalanced with its Dmitrii Donskoi guns. Which it probably is.

True, but I believe doing that won't be as lucrative and good as including it as a standalone cheapish premium that people could use to train and re-train crew on. They basically modelled a brand new ship, just to make it as a C hull module of an already existing ship? That would be...strange... considering how much they talk about how hard it is to make new models just like that.

I allways fire on Volleys. Only time i fire with seperate turrets is when im trying to finish off a target and not waste more of my turrets, or when I struggle finding the right lead and try to do ranging shots.

Yes, an IJN Gunboat with 8 100mm guns, the same ones as the Zao's secondaries, which have monstrous stats. But only 1 quadruple launcher for torps, a fair tradeoff considering the gunboat-capability this tub has. I would also like to see the Super-Akizuki class, basically a way faster Akizuki. I'd call that class the Akikaze (Autumn Wind, a name that fits the japanese naming for destroyers, but one never used on any japanese destroyer)

Not as big of a change IMO, It only gets two of its guns removed to make place for more AA and its new guns get new gun shields.. The Furutaka-class gets all of its 6 turrets ripped off and replaced by 3 twin turrets. The main question is would we want that as a C hull for the furutaka or a standalone Premium IJN cruiser on which we can train crew. (and which is not that expensive as the Atago) I would choose the latter, since I'm already past the Furutaka and probably dont want to see her again.

WARGAMING WHERE IS THIS!?

Why would anyone dislike the Zao? (Or Senjo, cause I like that name better) Looks great, accuracy is on point, Gun arcs are fine (and by fine I mean fine), spews fire like a dragon, And she is pretty stealthy. Add some pretty nice defensive torps for some clutch plays to boot and you get a pretty iconic ship.

Annother premium ship that is pound for pound better than ships of its class and tier. Seems to be recurring theme with WG as of late...

The shimakaze nerfs were too much. For the reasoning WG gave, which is "20km torps hitting targets way behind their original target" they went way out of their way to overnerf them, nerfing both detectability AND speed or speed AND range, and adding another set of torps, turning the Shima playstyle 180 degrees of what it was before. I agree that shima was annoying, but such a drastic change was uncalled for.

Way stronger tanks, yes. But those tanks, once penetrated, got destroyed. In WoT they still had a huge HP advantage (in case of Tiger vs T-34) That is because the Historical battles used the Arcade game Rules instead of having balanced health pools and their own set of rules. Thus a Tiger's techical superiority would be countered by T-34's quantity with no other advantages to the tiger (like 1.2k HP vs 450 HP) . Saying historical battles are impossible is true if the current game rules stay. But, with some simple balance changes to the game rules for that particular mode, It is very possible.

Imagine the whinefest if that would happen. Russians getting their beloved premium BB nerfed oh hell no.

You know what, We shall check the statistics in two months time to reveal which one is the better ship, Texas or NY. Deal? IMO its better to release a mediocre premium and then buff it if needs be than to release a borderline OP premium then be unable to nerf it if it turns out OP. Especially next to its copy-paste researchable ship.

Has more self-defence AA DPS than a Cleveland. And we all know what a Cleveland does to tier 5 CVs trying to attack it. Not even talking about tier 4 CVs or even Tier 4 CVs with 4-plane squadrons.

Oh god a BB captain complaining about HE and fires. I'll sort myself out.

About 5% less maneuverability does not warrant +100% protection against air attacks from same tier CVs.

Lets introcude a premium cruiser that counters battleships then.

But you know it IS op right? Basically a tad more sluggish new york that is immune to most CV attacks. (one of the classes that is supposed to counter BBs, remember? )

Without even looking I'd say the OP has played up to tier 4 and not higher.

Fair point.

Don't want the Texas in the EU shop anyway. Keep that P2W ship in the NA and dont even release it anywhere else..