Sunleader

WG mostly shows little Response. But they do pretty often actually know about the Community Opinion and take it into Consideration. Now. WG being Stubborn as hell is nothing new. They unfortunately tend to be really Hellbend on going through with their own Plans.... The Unique Upgrade Devblog just recently where they basicly saw the need to Explain their Changes after massive Complaints. But effectively despite acknowledging the Complaints decided to just go ahead with their own Plans. Is a Good example of that. In this case however I would not bet on them Ignoring the Feedback. They will Ignore all the Haters which just keep trying to claim that Subs are Impossible to Implement and Destroy the Game etc because they dont want them in the Game. Because its mostly pretty obvious that they are not Providing any Valuable Feedback but are just actively looking for Reasons to Refuse Implementing Subs. But for Proper Feedback that talks about problems and potential fixes they will read it and while they might not follow it 1 to 1 it will likely influence their decisions on changes. People keep Forgetting this. But WG themselves Stated that the Submarines right now are Barely in Gameplay Mechanic Testing. They are not even making Serious Attempts at Balancing Subs yet because they are not even sure that the Rough Gameplay Desing will Stay the way it is currently. Right now they are effectively just trying to gather Data on the current Iteration of Subs. And they likely not gonna make Repeated Changes during the Test because it would Screw the Data Sample. But I am fairly Sure the Next Test maybe next Month or something will actually Contain pretty Big Changes. Including that Subs will in one way or the other not be able to dip below and above 6m to switch Immunities around.

Well cant be helped. Enemy wasnt really Interested in Winning I guess.

It was likely a Bug that it was available already. Normally the Captains Voices are only Unlocked once you actually Own the Respective Captain for that Voice. Once you own the Captain you can then usually use the Voice on all Ships if you want. Or you can use the "National+" Voices to have each Voice Based on the Actual Captain of the Ship you have on it. Likely the Voices got Added with the Update but didnt get Locked. This has happened several Times in the past Actually. And well. It seems this will be Purely a Sale for EU Server then. I dont mind so much actually. For me getting Money around is Generally way less Effort than Grinding the Stuff out. As a Shift Worker I get quite a Ton of Overtime and Shift Bonuses. What I usually wont get is alot of Free Time. So I rather Buy some Stuff and Spend my Time in the Game having Fun. Than to Spend my Free Time Grinding for something by doing Repetetive Stuff all over. This is actually why I dislike the Research Bureu. Because its just a Senseless Repeat Grind of something I already Grinded....

See Above ^^ Same for @Franz_Kuznetsov @Miragetank90 @Javicen Thanks for Clarifying @MrConway

@TheWarJaC Yo Mate. Mind Clarifying something ? In the Patchnotes it Says under "New Content" "" Commanders Added Commanders Fubuki Shirakami and Marine Houshou with a special voiceover as a part of our collaboration with Hololive. Added Commander Ashley Violet. "" However. On the Asia Side. An Event for these Commanders has been Listed. And it is Flagged as Asia Exclusive. Does this mean that the Collaboration with Hololive is Limited to the Asia Server and wont be coming to the EU Server at all ? Is the Patchnotes just an Error because it was Copypasted without Checking that it contained a Region Exclusive Event ? Or is that a misunderstanding. And the Hololive Collab will come to EU just in a different form ?

As I said in the Post. DMM is a Region Locked thing. It Hosts Stuff like Kantai Collection. And everyone who Played Kantai Collection actually knows how much of a Pain it is to get an Account there when your from the Western World. So it would make Sense if that Event of getting the Hololive Captains for Free would be Limited to Asia while the Hololive Collab itself would be Available Globally. It should also be Noted. While the Event for DMM Account Creators to get these Captains is already going in Asia. The Post there actually Said that the Captains will only Enter Sale on a later Date. Which means that it is very well Possible that when the Captains Enter Sale they will also be Offered on EU and NA Servers. Something further Reinforcing that this Collab isnt Asia Only would be that it not only came up in the EU Patchnotes as Stated before. But as talked about in an Older Post of Mine. Has also been Announced with a Big Picture on the Dev Blog. Which would be somewhat Strange if it Included an Asia Exclusive Event. Still. The Uncertainty Stays. It would really Help if we could get Wargaming to Clarify this. I Realize that there might be no way to State the Details. But it could at least be Clarified if the Collab itself will come to EU as well or not.

Well then. Going by the Patchnotes. https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/game-updates/update-095-dockyard/ The Commanders have been Added to the Game already. "" Commanders Added Commanders Fubuki Shirakami and Marine Houshou with a special voiceover as a part of our collaboration with Hololive. Added Commander Ashley Violet. "" (Under New Content Tab at the End of the Post) Unfortunately there also is some Uncertainity. While Talking to Teob about a Different Forum Post. @_Teob_ actually Pointed this Site out to me. https://worldofwarships.asia/en/news/general-news/hololive_commanders/ Which Talks about the HoloLive Collab as an Asia Exclusive. However. The Announcement Handles Especially an Event where Players Registered on DMM get the Captains for the Collab for Free. Unfortunately it is not Clear if this means only the DMM Part of the Event is Asia Exclusive and EU will simply have a Different way to Obtain the Captains (Shop or Doubloons etc) Or if the Entire Event is Asia Exclusive in the First Place and someone just didnt Remove the Captains being Added from the Patchnotes for the EU Server. Maybe @MrConway could Help out on this Question and Clarify if the Hololive Collaboration is Entirely Asia Exclusive. Or if the EU Part of the Collab will be Announced Seperately. (For those who dont know. DMM is a Japanese Online Game Website/Company which is Region Locked. So its not Available Outside of Asia. Due to which it makes Sense that this Part of the Event might be Asia Exclusive even if the Actual Collab also Extends to EU Servers) Would be too bad if we didnt get her tough.

Right now its not even Worth Dirt. But its Possible that WG will buff it later.

Maybe he is Trying to Replicate your Funny Internal Value Calculation for how much Reward you are allowed to Give out per Hour of Grind you Demand from the Player ? ^^

Der Ship sieht echt seltsam aus. Ist das nen Neues Design oder is das nen Bug ? Sieht aus als würden mehrere Texturen nicht Richtig geladen werden.

T1 CB would likely be the most Fair Clanbattle Season ever xD But I would still Prefer T9

Warum ? Es wurde angekündigt 7-10 Uhr sind Server Down fürs Update. Wir habens um 8 Also noch etwa 2 Stunden wenn alles nach Plan verläuft.

Fair enough then. For your Info. Warfarin is one of the Best CV Players on EU Server. He is however aware just how OP CVs are. And he is not making a Secret out of it. He just tries to make clear that being OP doesnt mean you can just Kill anything and everything in any Situation.

Sorry but I dont get this. "" X Großer Kurfürst (56,88% popularity, +2,0 WR). Changes to UU Some of you were upset by the nerf, and we appreciate these feelings. But unfortunately the UU for this ship was a bit too effective and also pretty popular. The 5% nerf to main battery reload time bonus (from 15 to 10) may seem scary on paper, but comparing to the most popular "Main Battery mod.3" the UU actually provides: Only -2% main battery reload speed -8% worse main gun range +15% secondary armament reload speed +13% turret traverse speed For the safer playstyles, secondary armament DPM and turret traverse speed do not matter that much, but for aggressive and risky pushes the bonus is very considerable - and the UU in this case suggests exactly that, with a manageable trade-off. "" Thats just +2 which according you yourself would be Acceptable "" Because of the nuances above, as well as the facts that player account WR has more impact on battle performance than the WR on a particular ship, we consider the results of up to +2% acceptable. For example: "" And your Nerfing the Main Battery Reload Bonus by 33% From 15 to just 10% This basicly Means that this Upgrade now on Top of being Weaker than the Standard Gun Reload Upgrade. (only 10% boost instead of 12% boost) it also Nerfs the Range to less than 20km. And that when this Unique Upgrade according to your own Rules would sit just Barely at the Top of the Tolerance. You could Claim that the Tolerance goes to 1.99 in which case the Upgrade is 0.01% Higher than Allowed. So the Nerf should be Microscipical Small. But Nope. Its the BIGGEST Nerf out of all the Unique Upgrades lol. I Said this in the Other Topic already. But this Unique Upgrade now is Complete Trash. Its entirely Useless. The Range Debuff on that Module was already extremely Bad for GK because it meant that the GK which is very Vulnearble to HE Spam. Cannot keep Distance till there is an actual Window for a Push. Its likely the Reason why the Upgrade wasnt that Popular. The Literally Sole Reason why People used this Upgrade at all. Was because it provided a Bigger Reload Bonus than the Standard Reload Upgrade. Nobody cares about the Turret Traverse because German BBs from the get have very good Turret Traverse and can Handle these Debuffs without Issue. Now with the Unique Upgrade having been Nerfed to provide less Main Battery Reload than the Standard Module. There is Literally no Reason Whatsoever to use it. Let me Give you an Honest Prediction. I would assume this Upgrade will now Move into +0 or maybe even Negative Winrate. And the Popularity will likely Drop to about 20-30% Maybe even lower. I already Removed the Module. It was already Questionable to use it beforehand because the Range Nerf Hurts a GK in the Early match to a Tremendous Degree. But now there is just absolutely no Reason to use it at all anymore. Now its a Module that just Serves no Build. Whatever you want to do. The Standard Modules are the Better Choice.

CVs are OP and Broken. Warfarin knows that and has Stated that several Times in the Past. But Your Idea that they are basicly God is wrong. CVs are not Balanced. But they are not so OP that they can just kill everyone and everything in 3 seconds. This is a General Problem with People. They always seem to think that being OP means you always Win and Nobody can Possibly Beat you. But thats not what OP means. OP Means your Superior beyond the allowed Tolerance Levels. So if 2 Equal Skilled Player meet. The CV will always Win Hands Down. And even if there is Light to Medium Skill Differences in Favour of the Non CV Player the CV will Still Win most of the Time. But even CVs have Limits. And if the Skill Difference Grows Big enough. Same goes for Matches. A CV might be able to Carry quite a bit alone. But if half your Team Dies in 5 Minutes even the CV wont do anything about it. He cant just like that Equal 6 Enemy Ships. If 4-5 Enemy Ships Push he just doesnt have the Capacity to Stop them. And Quite Honestly I would Really ask you to not go on with this Overstating stuff. I know you dont like CVs and assume them to be Broken. I feel the Same. But making Overstatements only Undermines our own Point and makes it harder to hold a Proper Argument in our Case. As for Warfarin. Your free to Challenge him to a 1 vs 1 you in CV him in DD. Then you will See just how hard he can make your Life. Fair Warning tough. Even among the Unicum CV Players only Few Managed to Beat him.

Nope. Just more other Players have Joined. Played a Few Sub Games Today. And most of the Time less than Half the Players were Bots. Which of course also means that there is less Subs in Queue as they get Sorted into Matches much Faster. But hey as usual. Why use Logic when Logic would counter your own Claim right. Its better to just pretend to not notice the Truth.

1. Long Range Fire from BBs is Plunging Fire. Your Angling does not matter to that so much. Because it hits your Deck Armor which is not changing its Angle regardless of where your Bow is Pointing. 2. Not knowing the Game good enough to Know how to Deal Damage to any Target in any Situation is exactly what you call being bad at the Game. 3. I know that alot of People have Trouble Understanding this. But you know. There is this group of People called Casual Gamers. And They actually really Play this Game just for the Fun of it. With no Intention to Learn all Game Mechanics and Become Good at the Game. But Seriously just for Fun. I know thats absolutely unbelievable that some People would dare Playing a Game just to have Fun and not be Competetive. But Yes that Exists. And Behold. Because some Uneducated Voices Claim that this is actually the Majority of People thinking of this just a Game to Have Fun and not some Competition they have to make Effort in. So Yeah. How about you Spare yourself your Insults towards the People which maybe dont have have Several Hundreds of Hours in this Game and thus have this "Common Sense" of how the Game Works. And which therefore might often simply end up making a Mistake that might get them Killed early on ;) Especially for DDs the Truth often is. That your Job is to be out Front. If your not out Front you might Survive 5 minutes into the Game. But your also entirely useless. So the Guy who died after 3 Minutes at least might have Tried to do his Job :) I would any Day take him over the DD which is Camping behind my CV for the First few Minutes and thus Survives longer at least.

2 vs 1 is always a Disadvantage Mate. If 1 Players was not Disadvantages when Fighting 2 Players then there would be something seriously wrong with Balancing in the Game :)

There is no Carte Blanche. Drive it too far and you will always sooner or later run into Trouble. EA with their Lootboxes is a Good Example as they effectively took their Liberties on this so far that some Countries decided to simply Make Laws Covering it. But right now. The Truth is and Remains. That you will never Win a Courtcase against Wargaming (or any other Game Dev) on Changing your Virtual Assets.

If your Outnumbered your always at a Disadvantage. And if your last Enemies are of the Class Good against you even more so. However the Setting is no Different than already existing ones. DD is faster and thus in 1 vs 1 against BB cannot be Killed unless he is Potato. Because he can just stay out of Spotting Range. Even Cruiser can do that against BB. WG works by the Rule that the Smallest Ship is the one which Decides if the Battle happens or not. Meaning that usually thanks to Concealment and Speed the Smaller Ship will always have Potential Invincibility. Because they can just stay outside Spotting range of the bigger slower Enemy. Exceptions to that Rule are Radar Cruiser and CVs of course. Which can partially force an Engagement against Smaller Ships. However. This Incincibility always comes at the cost of effectively also not having much option to do anything yourself. Because you can only Refuse the Engagement. If the Enemy thus Caps you cant do much about it either.

I can only Speak for the EU and German Law. I dont know if maybe Greek other Countries have Laws which might be Different. As not all Laws inside the EU are the same. And Nations can have different Laws. EU Laws tend to be a Baseline. Not a Max Line. So Countries being Stricter would be Possible. Which is why for example you cant Buy Lootboxes in Belgium and why Youtube wont Show certain Videos in certain Countries. And the Keyword here. Is Licensed Digital Asset. The way the Game Works. You are merely Renting an Asset from Wargaming. This Rent is in Theory Indefinite. However Wargaming entirely Retains all Rights to that Virtual Good they Sold you. This is done for Safety Reasons on their Side and also to keep things Simple. Just to Give you an Example. Imagine an MMO which Sold Items for Real Money in their Cash Shop became Unprofitable and had to Close Down Servers. Or something that also Recently happened. An MMO Decides to Wipe the Servers for a Clean Start. Suddenly Thousands of Players will completely lose their Real Money Paid Assets entirely and Forever. In the Case of the Wipe we got a Definite Reinbursement. However each Player got the same. It wasnt given more than that even if you Purchased far more or far less than that Value. Condition was only that your Account Existed before Day X. And Yes. MMOs have actually been Sued based on this. Because this is effectively the 100% most Extreme Case where a Game Company just Deletes your Real Money Paid Assets entirely. But even that has never been Succesful. And Actually. If you wanna go into Hair Splitting here. WG actually Upgraded you. Because a Ship you got for a Free with a Camo thats Worth 20 Euro. Has been Replaced with a Ship Camo Package that would be Worth between 60 and 350 Euro based on other Ships in that Tier Area Sold by WG. So they actually Provided far more than Equal Compensation. Because in this Legal Setting your Trying to make. The Silver Research Tree Ship isnt Worth a Penny. And thus even if we assume your scenario to be true WG could just Delete it if they wanted and not give any Reinbursement whatsoever :)

Nope. He has no Case there Sorry. European Law does not Work like this. This has actually been Proven Repeatedly as Gamers actually tried to Sue Game Companies on this Stuff in the Past. Explicitly this has for example been Tried to Force a "Legacy" Version of Games. Because Players whose Assets and Game have been Altered by Updates wanted to Play the Game they Originally Bought and therefore tried to Sue Game Companies on that. Which by the way was a Far Stronger Case. Cause they never got Reimbursed for this in any Way at all. But none of these cases came even remotely far enough to even be considered a legal question. The Developer always makes sure to Reserve his Rights to Update and Alter any Ingame Assets entirely at his own Leisure. And this Right on his own Creation is something EU Laws actually Protect. And that has a Good Reason. Because thanks to that if a Game Developer wants to make Changes to his Game. He can do that without fearing Legal Cases. Imagine Law would actually work like that. Updating a Game would become next to Impossible because Any Single Old Asset Changed would potentially warrant a Legal Case. Meaning Games could only possibly Update by just adding new layers on top over and over without ever changing any of the older assets.

Actually what he says. Is that if Moskwa is your 5th Ship it will be Counted as such and will still Count as such once its Converted to a Coal Ship. Which might actually Simply be due to the Mechanic. Its possible that the Mechanic here only Unlocks the RB once you get 5 Lines. But does not actually Check Back on it. So once its unlocked it simply remains unlocked. This he also says with certainty. What he isnt Sure about. Is if Moskwa is your 4th Ship. And you dont manage to Complete a 5th Line before Moskwa is Converted. If Moskwa will still Count as your 4th Ship and thus Unlock the RB once you Finished Grinding your 5th Line. Which again might be due to the above Mechanic. Because if the Mechanic works like described above. Then Moskwa being Converted means you dont actually ever have 5 Lines and thus the RB wont be Unlocked. Meaning you then might need to Grind another 5th Line.

Oh Oh. Someone is very Butthurt about losing an Argument before. ^^ As for me having Idea on Laws. Well you know. There is a Surefire Way to Prove me Wrong. Good Luck in your Court Case against Wargaming. Assuming you even get that Far. As I honestly said dont even Expect any Court to even let this become a Case. I would place my Bets on it not even passing as a Valid Claim and thus being Dismissed by Court without even making it to the Trial. Needless to say. I expect absolutely Nothing. I know your Wrong. You know your Wrong. Everyone knows your Wrong. And so You yourself will Never actually even Attempt to Sue Wargaming on this ;)

Well that one cant really happen to me. I buy Premium Camos for Ships I like. Even if they are not very Powerful Ships. So their Performance Changing will usually not affect my Decision for their Camo.