Silvar

How about finaly BALANCING the pay to win ships and overpowered ships on the same time. Flint, Belfast, Black, Kidd, Khabarovsk, Saipan, Moskva, Alabama, Des Moines, (Conqueror maybe tough the silent nerf you did to its fire change did bring it down) Its sad when Wargaming does not have tact or professional backbone to actually balance these broken ships and then you have the nerve to claim it works when for example Flint and black ave over 63% winrate globally there is something wrong with those ships. Also How about rebalancing torpedoes especially IJN Torps since those are no longer in line on power concealment with other nations. ALSO STOP making changes to ships without having detailed patchnotes example the Conqueror fire Nerf

I admit i went full suicide rush with fastest DD's i had to get the stupid spot missions done. I question the Quality assurance teams and design teams sanity when designing these missions (Not fun, causes different gameplay than normal, suicide rushing, since only 1st person gets it causes people with mostly BB's, CA/CL be at disadvantage.)

Mushashi is garbage compared to Missouri in usability. The only thing that makes Yamato usable is the Guns and now with the nerfs to the guns on Tier 9 on Mushashi i dont see Mushashi being worth the effort or the money/time. Quite many times we have to ask WHY these changes or choices are made and we never get real answer from WG. So i will not be buying Mushashi its not good addition to the game and i think they should have used all this dev time to Balance the game instead (broken ships: Moskva, Conqueror, Kidd, Belfast, Khabarovsk, Missouri, Kutuzov. So what is common in all those ships is that those are better than the equal tier ship. Also things they should look again in the british BB fire change and improve japanese torps to samelevel as other nations)

Missouri Feels and fills tier X slot. Musashi will never do that.

Remove Manual Torp drop from planes problem solved or Add 5-10second arming time to torps like it should be

1. Matchmaking the Wargaming games worst aspect (how is 2 vs 0 CV or 2 vs 1 CV 2 tiers lower anyway fair?) Matchmaking needs work (atleast for CV's) Also it should rank the teams in general better to match each other ofcourse situation is not as bad as in WoT but still... 2. Cleveland Whoever decided it should be Tier 6 should go back to drawing board and raise the tier to Tier 7. Its ridiculously overpowered as Tier 6 tier 7 would be better spot for it. 3. Furutaka well i do not have much good to say about this ship its performance leaves lot to be desired for (also where are the Twin Turrets for it?) Its a cruiser that plays allmost like BB. It is not in a good spot where it is currently. It feels weird to play after Kuma and does not deliver good crossover to Aoba. Furutaka just feels out of place in the japanese tree at tier 5. 4. Low tier CV fighters its "nice" that japanese A2N2's Lose to American Curtis TS-1's (and the american planes do not even suffer damage) seems the same is true at tier 5 Carriers also... (Sarcasm aside air battle should be messy and planes should fall on both sides when engaged Dogfight scenario or atleast damage sustained currently it feels my fighters agains american Fighters at low tiers are just useless) 5. AA at Tiers 4-5 There is lot of work to do. Too many times you cannot do anything but watch when your BB/CL gets anihilated by wave after wave of torpedo bombers 6. Remove Manual launch from Torpedo planes its ridiculous and you cannot miss OR if you use manual launch increase torpedo Arming time to 5-10 seconds currently it is too easy to just pointplank range launch the torpedoes and never miss with torpedo planes. 7. DD's I think DD's currently are fine and need no change even tiers and balance between the DD's is fine 8. BB's in generall i think are fine maybe little tweaking in the low tier BB's AA armament needed but other than that i think BB's in generall are fine 9.Good work making unwanted advantage mods less easy to use but there is still work to do seems aiming mod is again raising its ugly head from the grave. Thank you for your time These are my opinions on the current things i find Being off in game and would like to see changed.

Auzor_S Yuo should make your own thread (since you have strong opinions of your own) Also your assumption for me to compare Cleveland to IJN cruiser is wrong i am comparing it to US Cruisers in the line its too good where it is its correct place should be Tier 7 And in What planet is it ok for matchmaking put 2 CV's VS 0 CV's OK? (you are talking nonsense and disconnects happen but matchmaking should be better.) Thank you and goodbye